Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Business, general

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Business, general

Comments: behavioral versus rational economics: what you see is what you conquer

Article Abstract:

It is unlikely that the debates between rationalist and behavioralist economics will be resolved soon. Rationalists argue that the theory of rationality is the most accurate and comprehensive hypothesis for explaining the operation of markets, while behavioralists maintain that there is simply too much nonrational market behavior for rationality to be descriptively accurate. The major areas of contention are reviewed in order to define which subjects are best served by rational analysis and which are more accurately described by behavioral analysis.

Author: Zeckhauser, Richard
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
Publication Name: The Journal of Business
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0021-9398
Year: 1986

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Clearly heard on the street: the effect of takeover rumors on stock prices

Article Abstract:

The impact of takeover rumors on stock prices was studied by analyzing the Wall Street Journal's 'Heard on the Street' daily column from Jan 1, 1983, through Dec 31, 1985. The results indicated that the market was efficient in reacting to the possibility of a takeover, the price of the target company's stock usually increased significantly before the takeover rumors were published, rumors did not accurately predict takeover bids, and rumors were generated by stock market observers looking for unusual changes in stock prices.

Author: Zeckhauser, Richard, Pound, John
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
Publication Name: The Journal of Business
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0021-9398
Year: 1990
Research, Prices and rates, Stocks, Acquisitions and mergers, Stock prices, The Wall Street Journal (Newspaper), Rumor

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Comments on Miller and on Kleidon

Article Abstract:

The research papers of Allen Kleidon and Merton Miller, which investigate supposed anomalies in the efficient markets theory, are discussed. Both papers attempted to show that behavioral explanations for anomalies in financial models are invalid, and that in many cases, no such anomalies exist. These claims are rebutted, and the role of irrational behavior in determining stock prices is described.

Author: Shiller, Robert J.
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
Publication Name: The Journal of Business
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0021-9398
Year: 1986

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Methods, Analysis, Economics, Behavioral assessment, Rational expectations (Economics), Economic methods
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Empirical tests of valuation models for options on t-note and t-bond futures. Mean Reversion and the Comovement of Equilibrium Spot and Futures Prices: Implications from Alternative Data-Generating Processes
  • Abstracts: Social support: its relationship to observed communications with peers and superiors
  • Abstracts: Competition and cooperation: new trends in corporate public issue identification and resolution. Issues management: Corporate fad or corporate function?
  • Abstracts: Competition and two-part tariffs. The effects of regulation on research and development: theory and evidence. Rate of return regulation with price flexibility
  • Abstracts: Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Fairness and the assumptions of economics. Comments on Arrow and on Lucas
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2026 Advameg, Inc.