Big Four hit by 14% fall in FTSE 100 audit client fees
Article Abstract:
The Big Four audit firms viewed a significant fall of 14 percent in its non-audit income earned from their FTSE 100 audit clients with 57% earnings in the year 2004 as compared to 65% in the year 2003. The decision by most of the firms to separate or sell their consultancies is one of the reasons behind the failure.
Publisher: Institute of Chartered Accountants in England & Wales
Publication Name: Accountancy
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0001-4664
Year: 2004
Forecasts, trends, outlooks, Sales & consumption, Forecasts and trends, Market trend/market analysis, Professional fees, Industry sales and revenue
Publication Name: Accountancy
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0001-4664
Year: 2004
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Big Four suffer 16% fall in FTSE 100 fees
Article Abstract:
The United Kingdom's Big Four accounting firms posted a decline of 16% in FTSE 100 fees in 2003. Fees fell to 714 million pounds from 848 million pounds for the year.
Publisher: Institute of Chartered Accountants in England & Wales
Publication Name: Accountancy
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0001-4664
Year: 2003
Financial management, Accounting Methods, Finance, Accounting, Company financing
Publication Name: Accountancy
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0001-4664
Year: 2003
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Subjects list: United Kingdom, Accounting firms, Accounting services
Similar abstracts:
- Abstracts: Miguel Duran: The man in the middle. Spanish update: sucedio en Espana
- Abstracts: Our institute in the 21st century. Reputation in focus. A big player on the financial stage
- Abstracts: Strategic partners: life insurance professionals team up with CAs to provide clients with financial planning for the long term
- Abstracts: On the timing ability of mutual fund managers. Bayesian alphas and mutual fund persistence. Why do money fund managers voluntarily waive their fees?
- Abstracts: How investors interpret past fund returns. Favoritism in mutual fund families? Evidence on strategic cross-fund subsidization
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.