Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Business

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Business

Buy-sell agreements need not restrict corporate carryovers

Article Abstract:

Section 382 provides shareholders and corporations with a means of protection against possible loss of tax benefits as resulting from the enforcement of provisions in buy-sell agreements that necessitate the sale or purchase of stock in situations marked by corporate loss. The limitations specified by Section 382 bar new stockholders from compensating for a profitable company's income through the losses of an acquired firm. Section 382, thus poses limits on the application of carryovers and specific built-in losses in situations where there is an ownership change in the corporation, whether it be through an 'ownership shift' or an 'equity structure shift.' Buy-sell agreements are bound by the scope of limits of Section 382 when the agreement is carried out in a loss year, when the agreement is in existence during a loss year that holds an added testing date, and when agreement provisions are enforced in a loss year.

Author: Kramer, Harry
Publisher: Warren, Gorham & Lamont, Inc.
Publication Name: Taxation for Accountants
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0040-0165
Year: 1992
Analysis, Laws, regulations and rules, Stocks, Loss deductions, Basis (Taxation), Buy-sell agreements

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Agency relationship found despite facade of independence

Article Abstract:

Agency relationships are often used in real estate transactions to overcome state usury laws limiting the interest rates of loans to unincorporated borrowers. The Tax Court, citing the Supreme Court's Bollinger decision, has set out three considerations for true agency relationships: the written agreement must establish that the corporation is an agent for its shareholders at the time an asset is acquired, the corporation must act as an agent in relation to the asset, and the corporation must at all times be represented as the agent and not the principle in dealings with third parties.

Publisher: Warren, Gorham & Lamont, Inc.
Publication Name: Taxation for Accountants
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0040-0165
Year: 1990
Cases, Real property tax, Real property taxes, United States. Supreme Court, Tax courts

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA



Subjects list: Taxation
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Shareholder benefits from corporate international diversification. Debt-for-equity swaps under a rational expectations equilibrium
  • Abstracts: Price movements as indicators of tender offer success. Moral hazard and adverse selection: the question of financial structure
  • Abstracts: Keeping the state from the corporate door. Implications for auditors' reports of FRS1
  • Abstracts: The economic efficiency of corporate culture. Developing an intrapreneurial assessment instrument for an effective corporate entrepreneurial environment
  • Abstracts: Management of the political imperative in international business. Market structure and business performance: an evaluation of buyer-seller power in the PIMS database
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.