Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Business

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Business

Casualty losses need not always be "sudden", and can include intangible factors

Article Abstract:

Casualty losses not covered by insurance are deductible if the taxpayer can prove that the loss was sudden and unusual. A casualty is the sudden or unique destruction of a property by an extraordinary or nonrecurring identifiable event. Progressive deterioration situations are usually not covered, unless the taxpayer can prove that the loss was sudden and unique. The taxpayer will have to provide proper documentation of relevant information, including: reports by an expert, such as an engineer; documentary proof of the uniqueness of the precipitating event, such as government reports; and documentation of the tax basis of the property, such as purchase contracts, deeds, and invoices. Adjustments are made for depreciation, and appraisals done before and after the casualty are used in determining value.

Author: Malloy, John M., Haynes, Jennielea
Publisher: Warren, Gorham & Lamont, Inc.
Publication Name: Taxation for Accountants
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0040-0165
Year: 1989
Analysis, Disaster relief

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Maximizing the tax benefits of qualified plan distributions to surviving spouses

Article Abstract:

The taxation of payouts from qualified plans necessitates certain tax planning considerations to minimize the tax liability of distributions. The financial needs of the spouse is the most critical factor in deciding how the spouse should receive the benefits from a qualified plan. The most basic decision is choosing between the immediate taxation of lump-sum distributions or tax deferral through rollover or periodic plan distributions. Lump-sum distributions provide taxation at lower rates but tax deferral through rollover or periodic plan distributions can produce enough of an income to offset higher future taxes. The greater the immediate need for funds, the more likely a lump-sum distributions should be chosen because its tax rates are preferable to those of tax deferral schemes.

Author: Kent, Bernard S.
Publisher: Warren, Gorham & Lamont, Inc.
Publication Name: Taxation for Accountants
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0040-0165
Year: 1990
Planning, Spouse's share

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA



Subjects list: Taxation, Tax accounting
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: On the need and opportunities for improving costing and cost management in healthcare organizations. Genomics Map Pharmaceutical Financing
  • Abstracts: Shareholders will consider an increase in RadioMobil's stock
  • Abstracts: Interface stability influences torso muscle recruitment and spinal load during pushing tasks. An evaluation of predictive methods for estimating cumulative spinal loading
  • Abstracts: On the Exclusion of Assets from Tests of the Mean Variance Efficiency of the Market Portfolio
  • Abstracts: Seasonality in the risk-return relationship: some international evidence. Production and risk leveling in the intertemporal capital asset pricing model
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2023 Advameg, Inc.