Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Business

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Business

Inflation and the current cost confusion

Article Abstract:

Scotland's accounting profession has refused to adopt current cost accounting as the acceptable method for valuing assets during inflationary times, despite governmental pressures, such as the Scottish Treasury's Byatt Report endorsing current cost accounting. Reasons for the failure to adopt current cost accounting are discussed. The primary reason for this refusal is that rising prices in Scotland are not uniform; some industries seem to experience more inflation than others. Other reasons include: the statement issued by the Accounting Standards Steering Committee suggesting that current cost accounting figures be based on the General Index of Retail Prices and be presented in addition to historical cost data; the 364-page "Inflation Accounting" report issued by the Committee of Enquiry, which served to confuse, rather than clarify, related issues; the inadequacy of the Retail Price Index to depict inflation accurately; the difficulty of maintaining comparability standards from year to year when asset values are restated each year; and the impracticality of reporting valuation differences in the case of borrowed funds as profit. Alternatives to the proposed current cost accounting standards being proposed are suggested and explained by example.

Author: Greener, Michael
Publisher: Accountants Publishing Co., Ltd.
Publication Name: The Accountant's Magazine
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0001-4761
Year: 1987
Accounting and auditing, Scotland, Inflation (Finance), Valuation, Assets (Accounting), Inflation (Economics)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Accounting for software development costs

Article Abstract:

A new American accounting standard covering the treatment of software development costs is examined. The ASC should examine the SORP or the SSAP to provide guidance to accountants. Statement No. 86 maintains that costs absorbed from software development should be taken as an expense unless the development stage is close to its final stages.

Author: Scott, Derek
Publisher: Accountants Publishing Co., Ltd.
Publication Name: The Accountant's Magazine
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0001-4761
Year: 1985
Planning, Software, Finance

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA



Subjects list: Standards, Accounting, Cost accounting
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Information technology Statement No. 2 - Good Accounting Software
  • Abstracts: The expectations gap and the Australian accounting profession. The education of accountants - a comment
  • Abstracts: Recognition for Management Accounting. Government Financial Reporting
  • Abstracts: Across the Pond: An Insight into US Accounting. The defective detectives. Exposure draft 33 - 1 October 1989: additional guidance on attendance at inventory locations and confirmation of accounts receivable and inquiry regarding litigation and claims - a proposed addendum to International Auditing Guideline 8, Audit Evidence
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.