Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Business

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Business

Preserving a partnership when the general partner files for bankruptcy

Article Abstract:

A partnership must provide for circumstances in which a general partner files a petition for bankruptcy. The bankruptcy of a general partner may result in a change in a control of the partnership that is not in the best interest of the limited partners. While there is no way to completely insulate a partnership from the adverse effects of a general partner's bankruptcy, steps can be taken to limit the negative consequences of such an occurrence. The duties and responsibilities of general and limited partners should be specified so that performance on both side remains owing and due for both parties. The performance activities of limited partners may include the payment of money or regular reviews and approval of actions of the partnership. Practitioners should structure the partnership agreement by specifying the duties, rights, and liabilities of all parties if a bankruptcy occurs.

Author: Lubrano, Andrew J.
Publisher: Warren, Gorham & Lamont, Inc.
Publication Name: Taxation for Accountants
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0040-0165
Year: 1990
Methods, Analysis, Tax accounting, Partnership, Partnerships, Bankruptcy

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Duty of consistency binds taxpayers to improper election

Article Abstract:

The court ruled in 'LeFever' that the heirs of an estate that filed a special-use valuation election were liable for taxes when the IRS found that the election was improperly conducted. One of the conditions that have to be met before such an election can be made is that the heirs continue to put the property to a qualifying use for a full decade. If they fail to satisfy this requirement, the IRS will assess the amount of uncollected tax because of the election within three years after learning that the property has been disposed of or place to a nonqualifying use. In the 'LeFever' case, the IRS found that the heirs cash rented the property to non-family members, which is considered to be nonqualifying use. The lapse of the three-year assessment period was found to be irrelevant to the case because of a duty of consistency.

Publisher: Warren, Gorham & Lamont, Inc.
Publication Name: Taxation for Accountants
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0040-0165
Year: 1997
Cases, Estate tax, Estate taxes, Election (Wills), Special use valuation (Taxation)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Fighting apartheid - the real costs. Exports made easy. Raiders invaders or simply good traders?
  • Abstracts: Institutional ownership, capital structure, and firm performance. Strategic orientation and characteristics of upper management
  • Abstracts: The impact of misrepresentative data patterns on sales forecasting accuracy. Emerging issues in sales forecasting and decision support systems
  • Abstracts: The mystery of the missing customer. On the crest of an ethical retail wave. The spectacular nature of success
  • Abstracts: Retirement plan rules supersede premarital contract. Simplified methods for uniform capitalization to be expanded by IRS
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.