Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Construction and materials industries

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Construction and materials industries

Macob, Outwing - now A and D

Article Abstract:

A legal case heard in the UK courts confirmed a decision made by an adjudicator in the construction industry was enforceable. The main contractor, Pagehurst Construction, had been called upon by an adjudicator to pay its subcontractor, A and D Maintenance, its outstanding claim of 98,000 pounds sterling. Pagehurst tried to use the fact it was proceeding against A and D on a separate legal issue as a reason why the adjudication should not be upheld. They also claimed there was not a contract. The two firms had been carrying out renovation work on a school in Kent, England.

Author: Helps, Dominic
Publisher: Builder Group plc
Publication Name: Building
Subject: Construction and materials industries
ISSN: 0007-3318
Year: 1999
Pagehurst Construction, A and D Maintenance

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


About time, too

Article Abstract:

A case heard in the British courts dealt with a disagreement between a client and the contractor over the late completion of a new hotel. The dispute between contractors Henry Boot and clients Malmaison Hotel (Manchester) was over whether the delay in completion time was due to problems caused by both the employer and contractor. Malmaison had taken damages worth 250,000 pounds sterling. Malmaison claimed it was Boots own fault completion was late. The case was initially heard in arbitration before going to court where the judge dismissed Boot's claim.

Author: Helps, Dominic
Publisher: Builder Group plc
Publication Name: Building
Subject: Construction and materials industries
ISSN: 0007-3318
Year: 1999
Hospitality industry, Henry Boot, Malmaison Hotel (Manchester)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


It's all in the timing

Article Abstract:

Construction companies and those with whom they contract should agree beforehand about the acceptable circumstances and consequences for delays. Recent court rulings such as in the Malmasion and the Brompton cases raise more questions than they answer about the concept of concurrent delay.

Author: Helps, Dominic
Publisher: Builder Group plc
Publication Name: Building
Subject: Construction and materials industries
ISSN: 0007-3318
Year: 2001
United Kingdom, All Other Heavy Construction, Construction NEC, Laws, regulations and rules, Construction

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United Kingdom, Construction industry, Cases, Contracts
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Package deals. Going up in our estimation. Treasure islands
  • Abstracts: New year brings new political landscape. Appeals court reverses roof pitch decision. Regulations adopted for privacy requirements
  • Abstracts: Delivery. Grains of sand on the beach. Lenders Tighten the Standards
  • Abstracts: Sounding off. Floodplain development under insurance threat. Your GBP250,000 green tax bill
  • Abstracts: Government to review state funding of R&D. Into the Bluu. Was Heseltine right?
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2026 Advameg, Inc.