Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Economics

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Economics

Restructuring, competition and regulatory reform in the U.S. electricity sector

Article Abstract:

Significant reforms in the US electricity sector regulations are being undertaken to eradicate the long-established monopoly of electric supply distribution. Benefits that are foreseen in the ongoing changes include the reduction in consumer expenditure resulting from the establishment of a healthy competition among electricity suppliers. Also, the decentralization of electric distribution is expected to decrease the medium- and long-term inefficiencies in electric supply. Areas of concern include the governance of transmission networks and establishment of service prices.

Author: Joskow, Paul L.
Publisher: American Economic Association
Publication Name: Journal of Economic Perspectives
Subject: Economics
ISSN: 0895-3309
Year: 1997
Analysis, Public utilities, Electric power distribution, Monopolistic competition

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


What can we learn from the grand policy experiment? Lessons from SO2 allowance trading

Article Abstract:

The sulfur dioxide emissions trading program, established under Title IV of the Clean Air Act of 1990, is a more cost effective policy than command-and-control environmental regulation in controlling air pollution. The sulfur dioxide allowance trading system, a market-based approach to pollution control, guarantees emissions reductions while allowing profit-seeking emitters to reduce total compliance costs. However, there is no clear evidence on the impact of the program on technological change or how pre-existing environmental policies affect the program.

Author: Stavins, Robert N.
Publisher: American Economic Association
Publication Name: Journal of Economic Perspectives
Subject: Economics
ISSN: 0895-3309
Year: 1998

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


An interim evaluation of sulfur dioxide emissions trading

Article Abstract:

The acid rain program, established under Title IV of the Clean Air Act of 1990 to control air pollution by relying on sulfur dioxide emissions trading, is more effective than command-and-control environmental regulation. An empirical analysis of allowance market performance and compliance costs under the program showed that the sulfur dioxide emissions goal has been achieved on time at lower costs and without extensive litigation. However, it may take time for efficient, competitive markets for tradable emissions allowances to develop.

Author: Schmalensee, Richard, Joskow, Paul L., Bailey, Elizabeth M., Ellerman, A. Denny, Montero, Juan Pablo
Publisher: American Economic Association
Publication Name: Journal of Economic Perspectives
Subject: Economics
ISSN: 0895-3309
Year: 1998
Prevention, Acid rain, Acid deposition

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Laws, regulations and rules, Environmental aspects, Emissions credit trading, Emissions trading, Air pollution, Sulfur dioxide
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Debt restructuring and economic recovery: analysing the Argentine swap. Britain and EMU: assessing the costs in macroeconomic variability
  • Abstracts: Political constraints on executive compensation: evidence from the electric utility industry. Strategic bidding in a multiunit auction: an empirical analysis of bids to supply electricity in England and Wales
  • Abstracts: Market structure and innovation: a survey of the last twenty years. A household production model of paid labor, household work and child care
  • Abstracts: Complementarity between import competition and import promotion. A survey of experiments on communication via cheap talk
  • Abstracts: Pricing and access under national competition policy: the case of the natural gas pipeline sector. Fiscal policy in Australia and Southeast Asia: an overview
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.