Navigating a labyrinth of methods: determining equipment costs in construction contract disputes
Article Abstract:
The various methods for determining equipment costs in disputes related to construction contracts are both time-consuming and confusing. When using the total cost method, the bid is subtracted by the contractor from the total actual project costs, assuming that all increases in actual costs resulted from the issue in dispute. In the actual cost method, invoices of equipment rentals are usually sufficient. The final corrective method from jury verdict allows a contractor to prove actual costs to enable the jury to estimate the damage and make a decision.
Publication Name: Journal of Management in Engineering
Subject: Engineering and manufacturing industries
ISSN: 0742-597X
Year: 1996
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Criticizing the contractor: a dangerous game
Article Abstract:
Architects and engineering firms must tread carefully when carrying out their responsibility to inspect project sites. Otherwise, they may be sued for defamation. An illustration is the case filed by Quality Granite Construction Co. Inc. against Hurst-Rosche Engineers Inc. (HRE) after the latter criticized the contractor's performance in a letter to its surety, Transamerica Premier Insurance Co. HRE was ordered to pay compensatory and punitive damages because the letter retracted its earlier certification that the contractor had completed the project.
Publication Name: Journal of Management in Engineering
Subject: Engineering and manufacturing industries
ISSN: 0742-597X
Year: 1997
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Differing site conditions: industry consensus opposes ruling
Article Abstract:
Organizations belonging to the construction industry met to discuss the effect of the reversal of a lower court decision by the US Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals regarding differing site conditions clauses in a contract between Millgard Corp. and McKee/Mays on a drilled-shaft-foundation construction project. The higher court disregarded the changed conditions clause (CCC) and placed more importance on the disclaimers. The construction industry decided to support the need for CCCs alleging that CCCs are advantageous for both contractor and owner.
Publication Name: Journal of Management in Engineering
Subject: Engineering and manufacturing industries
ISSN: 0742-597X
Year: 1996
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: The procedure of determining the order picking strategies in distribution center. Determination of nested reorder intervals in a distribution network
- Abstracts: Protecting against the foggy dew. Watertight connector redesign
- Abstracts: Determining infringement by X-ray diffraction. How to be an expert witness
- Abstracts: Analytical approach of determining job division in manual assembly systems. On the utilization of a split production system with inter-stage inspection
- Abstracts: Thinking ahead with forward pricing. Managing local collaboration. How do you manage a multiemployer workplace?