Some comments on Tambiah's response
Article Abstract:
Stanley J Tambiah took offense in a critique of his 1992 book, 'Buddhism Betrayed? Religion, Politics, and Violence in Sri Lanka,' which he claimed to have been blind to the book's anthropological value. Tambiah also felt that the critique was insensitive to such significant issues as the origins of Sinhala identity and the chauvinist historiography that stemmed from the interpretation of Mahawamsa. However, a thorough assessment of the book would prove that it was indeed lacking in sufficient ethnographic material. The flawed approach that the book employed also underscores the importance of transcending religion to better understand Buddhism's rationale for engaging in political violence.
Publication Name: American Ethnologist
Subject: Ethnic, cultural, racial issues/studies
ISSN: 0094-0496
Year: 1998
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
A response to Mosko's comments on "The Man of Sorrow."
Article Abstract:
An author responds to a review of his article on Mekeo sorcery. He took exception to the reviewer's comments that his ethnography of Mekeo sorcery was wrong. He believes that his dispute with the reviewer boils down to their differing ideas about whether the soul of sorcerers leave their body to attack their victims together with spirit entities or remain in the body while spirit entities attack. He claims that the reviewer supports the latter theory while he supports the former. The author also questions the reviewer's insistence that only his own beliefs are correct.
Publication Name: American Ethnologist
Subject: Ethnic, cultural, racial issues/studies
ISSN: 0094-0496
Year: 1998
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: The invented Indian: response to Strong. On singers and lineages: response to Rushforth. L'ethnologie du deshonneur: brief response to Lizot
- Abstracts: Response to Merrill and Heras Quezada's comments. Comments on "Until Death Do Us Part." (response to article by John Borneman in this issue, p. 215)
- Abstracts: Indiscipline and indigestion: a reply to Whitten and Whitten. The discourse of contrast in Foi: a reply to Kulick
- Abstracts: Banner year brings new worries; capital markets rose in 1998, but all is not well for professional money managers