Positive-Outcome Bias and Other Limitations in the Outcome of Research Abstracts Submitted to a Scientific Meeting
Article Abstract:
Research abstracts are more likely to be accepted for presentation at a medical conference if they have positive results. Researchers analyzed the fate of 492 research abstracts submitted to the planners of an emergency medicine conference. Thirty-six percent were accepted for presentation and of these 179 abstracts, 111 were eventually published as a full study in a medical journal. The most important predictor of acceptance at the conference was research originality and positive results. Publication in a journal was also more likely if the results were positive.
Publication Name: JAMA, The Journal of the American Medical Association
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0098-7484
Year: 1998
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Reliability of Editors' Subjective Quality Ratings of Peer Reviews of Manuscripts
Article Abstract:
A five-point scale is presented for editors that can be used to rate reviewers who participate in the peer review process. The editors at one journal used this scale to rate the quality of 4,161 reviews of 973 manuscripts over a 3.5-year period. A total of 395 reviewers were also asked to evaluate a fictitious manuscript. Reviewers who were highly rated tended to find more flaws in the fictitious manuscript. The scale was reliable and may be more accurate than the rate of recommendation for acceptance or the editor's agreement with the recommendation.
Publication Name: JAMA, The Journal of the American Medical Association
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0098-7484
Year: 1998
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Masking Author Identity in Peer Review
Article Abstract:
Many biomedical journals may be unable to completely hide the identity of the authors of a manuscript from a reviewer during the peer review process. Researchers compared the rate of success in masking this information among journals that required masking and those that did not. Journals that required masking had a 60% success rate in masking author identity compared to a 58% success rate at journals that did not. Reviewers who had much research or reviewing experience were more likely to guess the identity of the authors.
Publication Name: JAMA, The Journal of the American Medical Association
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0098-7484
Year: 1998
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Aphthous vaginal ulceration in two women with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Weekly fluconazole for the prevention of mucosal candidiasis in women with HIV infection: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
- Abstracts: Clinical and laboratory findings in the oculocerebrorenal syndrome of Lowe, with special reference to growth and renal function
- Abstracts: Over 10 million people cured of leprosy. Lyme disease may lead to autoimmune disease. NASA research helps map protein structures
- Abstracts: Racial and Ethnic Differences in Serum Cotinine Levels of Cigarette Smokers
- Abstracts: Prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis and rheumatoid factor in women: evidence for secular decline. Genetics of osteoarthritis