Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Health

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Health

Preemployment drug screening

Article Abstract:

While in 1977 drug users were distinguished from drug abusers, the social climate has changed to the point where any drug use can label a person as a drug abuser. Calls for preemployment screening of job applicants' urine ignore the fact that a positive result can occur in a person who used the drug once, as well as in a habitual abuser. An article in the November 28, 1990 issue of The Journal of the American Medical Association reports the results of a survey of postal workers whose urine tested positive for cocaine or marijuana when they were hired. Although negative outcomes (accidents, injuries, absenteeism) were more frequent for these employees than for those who were drug-negative, they were not as frequent as many reports have implied. The increases in rates of these outcomes ranged from 55 percent to 137 percent, not from three- to four-fold, or even more, as some authors have reported. The study was not able to evaluate job performance in true drug abusers, however, which would presumably be worse than that of casual users. Other criticisms of the research methodology, including aspects of subject selection, are made. Two other studies have found significantly greater consequences of drug use for job performance; they are discussed briefly, but also suffer from methodological problems. Preemployment drug test results should be interpreted in their proper context. Federal job applicants must discuss results with a physician trained in substance abuse before they are reported to the employer; this interview can rule out possible confounding factors (diet, other medications). Such rules are not applicable in the private sector. In addition, the number of job applicants who test positive for drugs (usually marijuana) is minuscule compared with the number of people arrested for any reason who test positive for cocaine (50 to 60 percent of all arrestees). Society might well focus its efforts on the greater concentrations of impaired persons who are involved in crimes. (Consumer Summary produced by Reliance Medical Information, Inc.)

Author: Wish, Eric D.
Publisher: American Medical Association
Publication Name: JAMA, The Journal of the American Medical Association
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0098-7484
Year: 1990
Evaluation, Mandatory drug testing, Drug testing, Employee drug abuse, editorial

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Drug and neurotransmitter receptors: new perspectives with clinical relevance

Article Abstract:

Receptors are highly specific recognition sites at which most drugs and neurotransmitters act via initially binding techniques. Two multiple-receptor subtypes, calcium antagonist and benzodiazepine receptors, are described. Several drugs use calcium channels to exert therapeutic and untoward effects. In the case of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, a heart disease characterized by overgrowth of the heart, the pathology of the disease could be related to high levels of calcium antagonist receptors. In the case of benzodiazepines, a group of mild tranquilizers, discrete central and peripheral receptors are employed to act. Central benzodiazepine receptors assist the neurotransmitter gamma-aminobutyric acid to deliver inhibitory effects. Peripheral benzodiazepine receptors exist in greatest quantities in several endocrine glands and are affected by therapeutic blood levels of such benzodiazepines as diazepam.

Author: Snyder, Solomon H.
Publisher: American Medical Association
Publication Name: JAMA, The Journal of the American Medical Association
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0098-7484
Year: 1989
Research, Physiological aspects, Cell receptors, Structure-activity relationships (Pharmacology), Benzodiazepines, Neurotransmitter receptors, GABA, Calcium channel blockers, Drug receptors, GABA receptors

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Quality End-of-Life Care: Patients' Perspectives

Article Abstract:

Many patients have definite opinions about end-of-life care. Researchers in Ontario interviewed 48 dialysis patients, 40 HIV-infected people and 38 people in a long-term care facility. Most of the patients wanted to receive adequate treatment for pain and other symptoms. They did not want to prolong the dying process and wanted to have some control over their situation. They did not want to be a burden on their families but at the same time wanted to strengthen their relationships with loved ones.

Author: Singer, Peter A., Martin, Douglas K., Kelner, Merrijoy
Publisher: American Medical Association
Publication Name: JAMA, The Journal of the American Medical Association
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0098-7484
Year: 1999
Terminal care, Beliefs, opinions and attitudes, Quality of life, Public opinion, Patients

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA

Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The development and testing of the Patient Record Pain Management Assessment Tool. A practical approach to improving pain management for inpatient gynecological surger patients
  • Abstracts: Physicians and the animal-rights movement. Placing Religion and Spirituality in End-of-Life Care. Should physicians prescribe religious activities?
  • Abstracts: Getting Religion Seen as Help in Being Well. Placing PRINCE in Perspective
  • Abstracts: Modest weight gain and the development of diabetes: another perspective. The association between infection with hepatitis C virus and diabetes
  • Abstracts: Older Americans present a double challenge: preventing disability and providing care. Easing elders' pain
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.