Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Allocation of settlements in multi-insurer coverage disputes

Article Abstract:

Claims against insurance companies who have not settled in multiple insurance company cases should be awarded according to the pro tanto method rather than the pro rata method. Pro tanto deducts settlements awarded from other insurance companies from the total amount due to plaintiff to calculate final settlement. Pro rata calculates the insurance company's individual liability, but may result in the plaintiff receiving more or less than the court awarded. Pro tanto is also more efficient than pro rata.

Author: Abraham, Kenneth S.
Publisher: Federation of Defense and Corporate Counsel
Publication Name: Federation of Insurance & Corporate Counsel Quarterly
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0887-0942
Year: 1998
Methods, Compromise and settlement, Settlements (Law), Valuation, Insurance claims adjustment, Damages, Damages (Law), Claims adjustment (Insurance)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The maze of mega-coverage litigation

Article Abstract:

Mass tort and environmental cleanup cases have as their corollaries mass insurance coverage litigation which is extremely complex and enduring. Insurance coverage issues are being determined on a case-by-case basis. Legal doctrine and management will eventually mature and provide the predictability which will reduce litigation and increase settlements. Environmental pollution and disease latency will ensure that coverage issues will continue.

Author: Abraham, Kenneth S.
Publisher: Columbia Law Review
Publication Name: Columbia Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0010-1958
Year: 1997
Analysis, Pollution liability insurance, Toxic torts

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Formed by thalidomide: mass torts as a false cure for toxic exposure

Article Abstract:

Thalidomide litigation was the first and determinant mass tort litigation in the US. Its procedural and substantive precedents have unfavorably tainted future mass tort solutions and created inflated views of the efficacy of the US liability and drug regulation systems. Mass tort litigation has never provided justice in mass injury cases and should be replaced by comprehensive and rational systems of regulation and insurance.

Author: Bernstein, Anita
Publisher: Columbia Law Review
Publication Name: Columbia Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0010-1958
Year: 1997
Thalidomide

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Cases, Mass tort suits
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Noncompetition agreements in bankruptcy: covenants (maybe) not to compete. Why it pays to file for bankruptcy: a critical look at the incentives under U.S. personal bankruptcy law and a proposal for change
  • Abstracts: ADR: the Siemens experience. Saving time and money in cross-border commercial disputes
  • Abstracts: Rethinking personal jurisdiction and choice of law in multistate mass torts. Innovation in the interstices of the final judgment rule: a demurrer to Professor Burbank
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.