Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Apocalypse next time?: the anachronistic attack on habeas corpus/direct review parity

Article Abstract:

The US Supreme Court in Wright v West raised the issue of whether the current parity between habeas corpus review in district courts and direct review in the Supreme Court should be continued. The issue was left undecided in that case but will probably be raised again. Justice O'Connor's analysis in support of maintaining parity would be strengthened by a recognition that habeas corpus was historically intended to be an appeal modeled on writ of error review. The fallacious view that habeas corpus is an original civil action derives from an influential article by Paul M. Bator published in 1963.

Author: Liebman, James S.
Publisher: Columbia Law Review
Publication Name: Columbia Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0010-1958
Year: 1992
Cases, History, Appellate procedure, Appeals (Law), Habeas corpus

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


"Some effectual power": the quantity and quality of decisionmaking required of Article III courts

Article Abstract:

An analysis of Article III and the Supremacy Clause shows that federal judicial review is the principal way for keeping federal law supreme over state law. An Article III court must decide the whole federal question independently and impose a remedy applying supreme law and neutralizing contrary law. Applying these principles, the qualified immunity and Teague v. Lane doctrines, and one reading of section 2254(d)(1) of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act are constitutional, and the Fifth, Seventh and Eleventh Circuit's reading of this section is unconstitutional.

Author: Liebman, James S., Ryan, William F.
Publisher: Columbia Law Review
Publication Name: Columbia Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0010-1958
Year: 1998
Laws, regulations and rules, Federal-state controversies

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The overproduction of death

Article Abstract:

The author examines criminal procedural incentives which lead to an increasing number of death sentences, the lack of procedures to curb prosecution seeking death sentences, and the failure of trial procedures in capital cases. He then offers a 10-part plan to reform capital trial procedures to curb these incentives.

Author: Liebman, James S.
Publisher: Columbia Law Review
Publication Name: Columbia Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0010-1958
Year: 2000
United States, Analysis, Criminal procedure, Capital punishment

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Judicial review
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Revised Article 9: the transition rules. Agricultural finance: comparing the current and revised article 9
  • Abstracts: A new era for the administration of qualified plans. Negative elections spur positive retirement plan participation
  • Abstracts: The other side of the Anne Frank story: the Dutch role in the persecution of the Jews in World War II. Wanted: mafia boss- essay on the personology of organized crime
  • Abstracts: All work and no pay: conflicts of (dis)interest among Chapter 11 professionals. A gray area in the law? recent developments relating to conflicts of interest and the retention of attorneys in bankruptcy cases
  • Abstracts: From Gardner to Circuit City: mandatory arbitration of statutory employment disputes continues. Top ten developments in arbitration in the 1990s
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2026 Advameg, Inc.