Application of Fifth Amendment to U.S. Constitution in international context - fear of foreign prosecution as ground for invoking privilege against self-incrimination - relevance of growing international law enforcement cooperation - role of U.S. judiciary in foreign relations
Article Abstract:
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled inappropriately in United States v. Balsys when it stated the Fifth Amendment law prohibiting self-incrimination did not apply to witnesses whose testimony may be used against them in a foreign jurisdiction. The Court concluded the privilege applied only to US criminal cases and did not have consistent use throughout the international community. However, the right to silence is becoming a standard international right; individual integrity should prevail over self-incrimination; and although the Court stated the US was not an agent of foreign prosecution, such prosecution could not occur without US aid.
Publication Name: American Journal of International Law
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0002-9300
Year: 1998
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
International law and international relations theory: a new generation of interdisciplinary scholarship
Article Abstract:
Interdisciplinary scholarship between international law (IL) attorneys and international relations (IR) experts recognizes that both fields deal with the same world, globalization dynamics and institutions which regulate affairs. IR theory helps lawyers understand the political function of agreements. An understanding of IL helps IR experts realize the tangible effects law has on international relations. Future collaboration will help design processes by which international agreements are made.
Publication Name: American Journal of International Law
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0002-9300
Year: 1998
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Rwandan genocide and the international law of radio jamming
Article Abstract:
The issue of jamming radio programs needs to be reexamined in light of radio being used for propaganda and to incite genocide in countries such as Rwanda. The US is opposed to any jamming of civilian radio but the Rwandan genocide possibly could have been prevented if radio jamming had been used offensively to prevent the propaganda supporting racial hatred. A new international standard that allows for jamming in extreme circumstances should be established.
Publication Name: American Journal of International Law
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0002-9300
Year: 1997
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: The political economy of a bilateral investment treaty. International relations theory, international law, and the regime governing atrocities in internal conflicts
- Abstracts: Origins of modern international arbitration. International arbitration: the next growth industry. 10 techniques for managing arbitration hearings
- Abstracts: The law governing a franchisor's encroachment in the market of its franchisee gains clarity because of a recent 5th Circuit decision delineating standards
- Abstracts: Minimum required distribution rules clarified again. Operating retail clothing and optical goods businesses in same shopping mall not a single line of business for purposes of qualified employee discount rules
- Abstracts: Crimes against humanity: Nuremberg, 1946. The struggle against hate crime: movement at a crossroads