Comments on Stephen Carter's lecture

Article Abstract:

The author comments on Stephen L. Carter's thesis that the constitutional protection under the Free Exercise Clause pressures religions to conform to what the Supreme Court says government may proscribe. The author notes that Congress may pass laws benefiting religious groups following negative judicial rulings, and protection of free exercise rights helps small or minority religions.

Author: Choper, Jesse H.

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The religion clauses and Justice Brennan in full

Article Abstract:

The author disputes Stephen L. Carter's contention that the Constitution's establishment of religious freedom harms established religion by taking away its power to subvert the state. The author states that Carter misinterprets Justice Brennan's views on the establishment clause and ignores the dangers that could result if believers capture state policy.

Author: Lupu, Ira C.

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Religious freedom as if religion matters: a tribute to Justice Brennan

Article Abstract:

The author contends that treating religious activity as a constitutional right conflicts with the idea of religion itself, and may harm religions. Religion provides the believer with a transcendent reason to subvert state power, and for this reason, the state will always try to domesticate it.

Author: Carter, Stephen L.
Analysis, Church and state

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Laws, regulations and rules, Freedom of religion, Criticism and interpretation, Carter, Stephen L.
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.