Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Court strikes down asbestos accord

Article Abstract:

The US Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit rejected the $1.3 mil settlement of claims by all present and future personal injury and wrongful death victims against 20 asbestos companies in Georgine v. Amchen Products, Inc. by decertifying the class action. The plaintiffs must now bring each action separately, thereby causing more court congestion and delay. Most of the damages will go to transaction costs and legal fees.

Author: Barnes, Patricia G.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1996
Compromise and settlement, Settlements (Law), Product liability, Products liability, Asbestos

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


It may take a village... or a specialized court to address family problems

Article Abstract:

Many states have realized the lack of family-friendliness of the US family court system and have instituted unified family courts, which consolidate divisions solving family problems into one operation. These courts work together with social service agencies. The ABA has backed the concept, and Rhode Island was the first state to adopt such a court in 1961. The major obstacle to such a system seems to be financial.

Author: Barnes, Patricia G.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1996
Management, Family courts, states

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The plot thickens for murder suspect: N.J. court upholds seizure of unpublished fiction to establish motive in assault, killing of nurse

Article Abstract:

A New Jersey appeals court upheld the seizure of a murder suspect's unpublished writings and diaries. The court indicated that the material establishes motive and state of mind, meeting the requirements for a search warrant. Courts are inconsistent in their rulings regarding the admittance of private writings as evidence.

Author: Barnes, Patricia G.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1998
New Jersey, Evidence (Law), Testimony, Privacy, Right of, Right of privacy, Murder, Diaries, Manuscripts

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Cases
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Now you see it, now you don't; vanishing verdicts are more commonplace, especially thanks to judges. Reform measures made little impact
  • Abstracts: Motor vehicle policy - assured to take all reasonable steps to safeguard a vehicle. part 2 Antico v. Heath Fielding Australia Pty Ltd
  • Abstracts: Carpe demonstratores: towards a bright-line rule governing seizure in excessive force claims brought by demonstrators
  • Abstracts: Constitution provides no right to be killed. Defense of marriage - or attack on family? Assisted suicide is a federal case
  • Abstracts: Petitions and priorities. Risk assessment perspectives from the agency view. The Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2026 Advameg, Inc.