Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Courts battle over Harris execution; an impatient Supreme Court orders an end to last-minute stays by 9th Circuit

Article Abstract:

Both those who are for and against the death penalty agree that the chaotic way in which Robert Alton Harris was put to death in mid-1992 was harmful to the process of justice. Proponents of the death penalty think the attempts at last-minute delays were abusive and that claims raised at the last minute, such as the one that death in the gas chamber constituted cruel and unusual punishment, should have been raised much earlier during Harris' years on death row. Opponents think the last minute rush to present claims happens because the approaching execution clarifies issues.

Author: Reske, Henry J.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1992
Public opinion, Capital punishment

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Supreme Court bans routine vacatur; unanimous decision considered adverse to business, government

Article Abstract:

The US Supreme Court has ruled in US Bancorp v. Bonner Mall that parties settling a case may not routinely vacate rulings which have been appealed, using the rationale that precedents are valuable to the whole legal community and not just private litigants. The Bonner decision may have wide-ranging impact since litigants often try to nullify judgments against them by having adverse rulings vacated after settlement.

Author: Reske, Henry J.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1995
Cases, Judgments, Judgments (Law), Equitable remedies, Vacatur

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Lesson in rewriting consent decrees; Barr plan to lift prison population caps hindered by Supreme Court decision

Article Abstract:

Attorney General William P. Barr plans to help states that wish to contest court orders or consent decrees regarding prison overcrowding. A recent Supreme Court case, Rufo v Inmates of Suffolk County Jail, may impede his plans. It holds that consent decrees should not be rewritten so as to conform to the bare minimum the Constitution requires.

Author: Reske, Henry J.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1992
Analysis, Prisons, Imprisonment

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Prison sentences
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Remarks by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Associate Justice, Supreme Court of the United States. Dedication to Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg
  • Abstracts: ADR is the better way to settle disputes over Y2K; mediation and arbitration allow parties to control the process in ways that litigation cannot
  • Abstracts: In 'O'Hagan,' the Supreme Court gets second chance to adopt, and define the scope of, SEC's 'misappropriation theory' of insider trading
  • Abstracts: Court secrecy dealt yet another blow. Tax Court scrutinizes a defense; innocent spouse. Texcas ADA caseload puts 5th Circuit in major role; plaintiffs, EEOC are likely to suffer setbacks from court that continues to define disability narrowly, lawyers say
  • Abstracts: Court's waste-test order helps lenders. Circuit courts split on scope of FIFRA. Cases split on medical-device claim pre-emption; courts differ in applying the test set out in 'Medtronic' to decide if U.S. law pre-empts tort claims
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2023 Advameg, Inc.