Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Enforcement proceedings of patent rights in Korea

Article Abstract:

Patent rights are enforced differently in South Korea than in the US as shown by recent court decisions and rulings of the tribunal of the Korea Industrial Property Office. Enforcement proceedings are divided into an administrative avenue and regular court cases of infringement. There is a confirmation trial on the patent claim's scope and claims are interpreted differently. Court actions consist of preliminary injunctions, actions for civil infringement and criminal prosecutions.

Author: Kim, C. Leon
Publisher: Patent and Trademark Office Society
Publication Name: Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0882-9098
Year: 1993

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Reconsidering Walter's "implemented ... to refine or limit claim steps."(patents for algorithms)

Article Abstract:

The Freeman-Walter-Abele doctrine will remain useful for protecting computer-based inventions such as mathematical algorithms, although the Patent and Trademark Office indicates that it is no longer the sole standard. In re Walter produced guidelines including the statement "implemented ... to refine or limit claim steps." This is central to proving that an algorithm is practically applied, by permitting a claimant to focus upon the data gathering refinement steps of an algorithm.

Author: Auchterlonie, Thomas S.
Publisher: Patent and Trademark Office Society
Publication Name: Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0882-9098
Year: 1996
United States, Laws, regulations and rules, Algorithms

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Transition from central to peripheral definition patent claim interpretation system in Korea

Article Abstract:

The South Korean Supreme Court appears to be using a broader, and more internationally typical, interpretation of patent protection than it has in the recent past. Previously, the court limited protection to specific examples listed in a patent specification, but has broadened protection to cover more intuitive and result-oriented techniques and processes. The evolution of this change and specifically the effect of the 1981 amendment to the Korean patent law are discussed.

Author: Kim, C. Leon
Publisher: Patent and Trademark Office Society
Publication Name: Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0882-9098
Year: 1995
Korea, South

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Interpretation and construction, Patent law, Cases, Patents
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: ABA eyes hardball play. When the problems are fully considered, it is evident that reform has its limits
  • Abstracts: Employment protection rights. Contractual and employment protection issues. Part-timer's dismissal complaint out of time
  • Abstracts: Seeking a wider role: underrepresented in high-level law positions, Hispanics struggle for access. The art of getting paid: telephone reminders and credit card options can boost cash flow
  • Abstracts: Ethics of defending guilty clients. O.J. prosecutors failed to keep eye on ball
  • Abstracts: U.S. law firms in U.K. face a risk of new taxes; revolutionary change in U.K. law may increase compliance costs
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.