'Festo' opens the door; case sharply limits doctrine of equivalents; designing around patents will now succeed more

Article Abstract:

The limitation of the patent law's doctrine of equivalents imposed by Festo Corp. v. Shiketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co. is discussed. The reasons Festo may represent a profound change in existing patent practice are discussed.

Author: Wasleff, John A., Anderson, J. Scott, Rose, Bruce J.
Cases

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Was Festo really necessary?

Article Abstract:

The authors discuss the major change in patent law instigated by the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's decision in Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinsoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co., which limits prosecution history estoppel to an exception and precludes the use of the equivalents doctrine in many cases.

Author: Atkinson, William M., Wasleff, John A., Rose, Bruce J.
Interpretation and construction, Patent law

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Why not the statute? Revisited

Article Abstract:

The author discusses the Federal Circuit's decision on patent law prosecution history estoppel in Festo Corp. and patent law generally, prior to the creation of the circuit court in 1982. Topics include the doctrine of equivalents and the Federal Circuit's piecemeal creation of law.

Author: Hantman, Ronald D.
Beliefs, opinions and attitudes, United States. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Equivalents doctrine (Patent law), Laws, regulations and rules, Estoppel
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.