Improving judicial gatekeeping: technical advisors and scientific evidence

Article Abstract:

Judges can take a number of steps to promote perceptions of neutrality in the use of technical advisors to provide testimony on scientific issues. The US Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ruled that judges should function as gatekeepers regarding the admissibility of scientific evidence. The Court recognized that technical assistance would be needed by judges. To promote fairness and openness, the parties should be involved in the selection of the technical advisor and communications between the judge and advisor should be made available to the parties.

Laws, regulations and rules, Evidence, Expert, Expert evidence, Evidence, Scientific, Scientific evidence (Law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Trial as error, jurisdiction as injury: transforming the meaning of Article III

Article Abstract:

The author describes the shift in federal court practice from trials to dispute management due to increased attention by judges on settlement and disposal of cases at early stages by making optimal use of civil procedure law and rules. The changing conception of judicial power under Article III and changes in the role of the federal judiciary are explored.

Author: Resnik, Judith
United States, Analysis, Management, Federal courts, History, Judicial process, Judicial power

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA



Subjects list: United States
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.