Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Directed trustee not subject to ERISA liability as fiduciary or co-fiduciary

Article Abstract:

The US 1st Circuit Court of Appeals in Beddall v. State Street Bank and Trust Co. held that an independent investment manager's continual 10 year error in valuing real estate holdings of a defined contribution plan was enough to allow no fiduciary liability to attach to the bank plan trustee. The bank became suspicious of inappropriately high valuations and hired an independent appraiser who verified the suspicion. That undertaking did not cause the bank-directed trustee to acquire fiduciary liability.

Publisher: Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.
Publication Name: Tax Management Compensation Planning Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-8607
Year: 1998
Liability (Law), Legal liability, Defined contribution plans

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Health benefits plan administrator is subject to lawsuit as plan fiduciary

Article Abstract:

Third party administrators can be held liable as plan fiduciaries under ERISA, according to a 1997 Ninth Circuit decision. The court ruled such administrators can be sued as unnamed fiduciaries if its actual duties fit the ERISA criteria for fiduciaries. Express service contract provisions did not necessarily exempt third party administrators, according to the court, which applied a four-factor test to determine liability.

Publisher: Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.
Publication Name: Tax Management Compensation Planning Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-8607
Year: 1997
Cases, Health insurance

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA



Subjects list: United States, Laws, regulations and rules, Fiduciary duties
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Disproportionate investment of plan assets in residential mortgages not imprudent. Mortgage loans from bank under program established by pension trustees not subject to s. 72(p)
  • Abstracts: In the limelight's glare; military lawyers plan counterattack in response to increased media coverage. Sign on the dotted screen: ABA takes lead in developing guidelines for electronic document verification
  • Abstracts: Transitional losses: criteria for compensation. Trends in youth smoking: is there really a crisis? Banks, insurance companies, and mergers
  • Abstracts: The constitutional committment to legislative adjudication in the early American tradition. Adjudication and its discontents: coherence and conciliation in federal Indian law
  • Abstracts: Supreme Court broadens actions available under ERISA s. 510 to include both welfare and pension plans. part 2 Seventh Circuit holds that "parties in interest" are not liable to plans for participatiing in prohibited transactions
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2026 Advameg, Inc.