Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Is Missouri v. Holland still good law? Federalism and the treaty power

Article Abstract:

The doctrinal trend of the US Supreme Court to limit the reach of federal power under the Commerce Clause in deference to state sovereignty interests should not be followed in the area of the federal treaty power. The Court's 1920 decision in Missouri v. Holland established that federalism issues do not arise in the area of the treaty power. States have adequate protection in this area through operation of political processes. Precedential, practical, and foreign affairs considerations support not disturbing the federal power.

Author: Healy, Thomas
Publisher: Columbia Law Review
Publication Name: Columbia Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0010-1958
Year: 1998
United States, States, State rights

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Direct and collateral federal court review of the adequacy of state procedural rules

Article Abstract:

Traditional interpretation holds that federal courts determining whether a state procedural rule unduly burdens the attempt to assert a federal right, examine the rule on its face, rather than in specific cases. In fact, the history of the Supreme Court's reviews of procedural rules show that it has used both approaches. Federal courts should use only a facial analysis in direct review, but should be able to examine fact of specific cases in habeas corpus review.

Author: Struve, Catherine T.
Publisher: Columbia Law Review
Publication Name: Columbia Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0010-1958
Year: 2003
Company legal issue, Cases, Federal jurisdiction, Habeas corpus, Procedure (Law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Does federalism constrain the treaty power?

Article Abstract:

Sovereign immunity and the anticommandeering priciple could potentially serve as devices to limit the extent to which the federal government can enforce state compliance to the terms of international treaties. However, the use of foreign compacts by states combined with treaties could address these concerns and keep treaty power unconstrained.

Author: Swaine, Edward T.
Publisher: Columbia Law Review
Publication Name: Columbia Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0010-1958
Year: 2003
Other Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities, Constitutional Procedures, Interpretation and construction, Constitutional law, Constitutional interpretation, Sovereign immunity

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Laws, regulations and rules, Federalism, Treaty-making power, Government regulation
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Why is black America so poor? 'Racism' and the 'punditry' problem. Why is Russia still so poor 10 year after the fall of Communism?
  • Abstracts: Sexual harassment under workers' compensation law. Corporate and industrial hazing: barbarism and the law. Sexual harassment and workers' compensation
  • Abstracts: In good form: two programs take the pain out of preparing debtors' forms. Security at your fingertips
  • Abstracts: The rise of the whistleblower and the death of privacy: impact of 9/11 and Enron. "To ends the most public and universal": an overview of the HIPAA privacy rule
  • Abstracts: Montana court continues its hostility to mandatory arbitration
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.