Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Is this the end of Roe? The court revisits abortion

Article Abstract:

Reagan and Bush judicial appointments have created a Supreme Court with a conservative majority, putting Roe v Wade and a woman's right to an abortion in danger. 1992 will see the review of Planned Parenthood v Casey and a Pennsylvania law limiting a woman's right to an abortion. Pro-choice lawyers fear that the court will abandon Roe's strict scrutiny test in favor of a rational-basis test that abortion laws would have to comply with and that this would permit state laws forbidding abortion in all cases except when the mother's life is in danger.

Author: Reske, Henry J.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1992
Pro-life movement, Pro-choice movement

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Restrictive abortion law upheld; cert petition asks U.S. Supreme Court to decide if Roe is overruled

Article Abstract:

The Supreme Court must articulate a clearer view of abortion law in an upcoming appeal case. The 3d US Circuit Court of Appeals held that when the high court is split on an issue, lower courts must look for a moderate position. The court found that, based on recent Supreme Court decisions, the Roe v. Wade standard no longer held. The 3d Circuit Court took as the new legal test Justice Sandra Day O'Connor's position that abortion regulations can only be scrutinized when they place an 'undue burden' on the right to abortion.

Author: DeBenedictis, Don J., Reske, Henry J.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1992
Interpretation and construction, Practice, Judicial opinions, O'Connor, Sandra Day

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Courts wrangle over Haitians; federal judge who stopped repatriation overruled by divided appellate panel

Article Abstract:

The Bush administration's policy of returning illegal Haitian immigrants to Haiti has so far prevailed in the courts. The Supreme Court lifted a ban on repatriation on Jan 31, 1992. Advocates for the Haitians claim they are victims of racial discrimination, citing the open arms policy the government has for Cuban refugees. The administration and immigration reform supporters claim the Haitians are economic refugees, and that only political refugees are exempt from repatriation.

Author: Reske, Henry J.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1992
Cases, Deportation, Emigration and immigration law, Immigration law, Refugees, Haitian, Haitian refugees

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Laws, regulations and rules, Abortion
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: A CGL is not sole source of Y2K coverage; corporations may be able to recover their millennium-bug remediation costs under their property insurance policies as well
  • Abstracts: State responsibility in private civil action - sovereign immunity - immunity for jus cogens violations - belligerent occupation - peace treaties
  • Abstracts: Ethics on hold; new legislation reining in federal lawyers confuses rather than clarifies. Checkbook credibility?
  • Abstracts: Disclosure sets a time limit on IRS gift revaluation. Save transfer taxes with family limited partnerships. Avoid tripping on family limited partnership trap
  • Abstracts: Bypassing the Security Council: ambiguous authorizations to use force, cease-fires and the Iraqi inspection regime
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.