Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Letter Ruling 9508009 - busting a "B": why and how?

Article Abstract:

The IRS affirmed in Private Letter Ruling 9508009 that tax-free "B" reorganization treatment can be avoided by paying cash to reimburse expense incurred by shareholders in the target corporation. The exchange in a "B" reorganization must be solely stock for stock. The ruling appears to indicate that brief ownership of stock subsequently sold for cash did not defeat tax-free treatment. The acquiring corporation may have wanted the exchange to be taxable to achieve basis step-up. The target may have been a non-US person, may have received additional compensation or may have had a realized loss.

Author: Bloom, Gilbert D.
Publisher: Warren, Gorham & Lamont, Inc.
Publication Name: Journal of Corporate Taxation
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0094-0593
Year: 1996
Planning, Tax-free exchanges, Stock transfer

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Two questionable spin-off rulings

Article Abstract:

Two favorable IRS letter rulings regarding spin-offs demonstrate that taxpayers should not assume that the IRS will not issue perverse rulings. In Letter Ruling 9537027, the IRS accepted the spin-off despite the fact that one party acquired an interest through a merger in anticipation of the spin-off. In Letter Ruling 9540050, the IRS accepted a business purpose that was manufactured through the taxpayer's refusal to meet standard requirements for a business loan.

Author: Bloom, Gilbert D.
Publisher: Warren, Gorham & Lamont, Inc.
Publication Name: Journal of Corporate Taxation
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0094-0593
Year: 1996
Analysis, Tax administration and procedure, Tax administration

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Letter Ruling 9719036 - ruling letters rush in where opinion letters fear to tread

Article Abstract:

IRS Letter Ruling 9719036 exemplifies a taxpayer-favorable ruling which runs counter to established tax law. Using grandparent stock as consideration in a tax-free reorganization appears acceptable to the IRS under the ruling. Proposed regulations are likely to take this same position, given that the letter ruling permits use of grandparent stock in this de facto manner.

Author: Bloom, Gilbert D.
Publisher: Warren, Gorham & Lamont, Inc.
Publication Name: Journal of Corporate Taxation
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0094-0593
Year: 1998
Stocks

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Taxation, Corporate reorganizations
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Italian tax treaties and domestic law: some remarks about the relationship between provisions on foreign tax credit
  • Abstracts: Tracking the big bucks: selecting a timekeeping, billing and accounting system for your large firm. Strategic thinking
  • Abstracts: Writing to the ear: clarity and simplicity help readers to 'hear' what you have to say. The art of persuasive legal writing: briefs come alive when every word sings to the reader
  • Abstracts: D.C. firms are branching out; more outsiders in their territory force D.C. law firms to counterattack. L.L.C. and L.L.P. formats can benefit law firms; by operating as limited liability corporations and partnerships, firms can avoid dual taxation
  • Abstracts: Amicus networking add-on. $hopper's guide to personal information managers
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2026 Advameg, Inc.