More hospitals eye conversion to taxable status; the benefits of access to equity markets and physicians' capital may outweigh new tax liability
Article Abstract:
Conversion to taxable status might make economic sense in an era when health costs are ballooning and the field has become a buyers' market. Taxable status will let a hospital obtain equity capital and give it real financial integration with physicians. Other advantages include a growth in employee incentives and the chance to achieve improvements in operational efficiency. These advantages may outweigh the taxable which would be levied and the charitable contributions received. The financial, political and legal issues for a hospital thinking of converting are listed.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1996
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Union activity inside hospitals may be limited; the law restricts solicitation to areas away from patient care
Article Abstract:
Hospitals' union solicitation rules can be more restrictive than those of other employers. The NLRB permits a ban on solicitation during working hours in patient care areas since this might interfere with the quiet needed by patients for recovery. Federal courts have defined patient care areas in various ways, however, hospitals are almost never obliged to permit union organizers who are not employees on their property. Whatever decision hospitals make about solicitation, they should be uniform in the application of their rules.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1993
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Filing disability claims may preclude lawsuits: in some jurisdictions, courts do not allow plaintiffs who apply for benefits to sue under the ADA
Article Abstract:
Courts disagree on whether filing for disability benefits bars ex-employees from suing the former employer, or a potential employer, under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Some courts have agreed with employers that the individual's claim, in applying for benefits, to be totally disabled, is grounds for dismissal. Other courts believe such dismissal would violate the intent of the ADA, and that receipt of disability benefits need not mean the individual is incapable of useful work.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1995
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: IRS calling; don't worry, maybe it's not an audit. Take shelter; enjoying the benefits of pension and profit-sharing plans
- Abstracts: Positive rights and state constitutions: the limits of federal rationality review. Interpretation and authority in state constitutionalism
- Abstracts: Recent cases reinforce a client's right to receive accurate information about a case so that the risks of litigation and the value of settlement can be evaluated
- Abstracts: Corporate introspection in the nineties: "to thine own self be true." Personal trading by portfolio managers revisited: the Institute's recommendations a year later
- Abstracts: An overview of federal medical savings accounts. Supreme Court unanimously decides employer may amend overfunded, contributory defined benefit plan despite employees' class action arguing the amendment was improper