Provisional measures pending constitution of an arbitral tribunal under UN Convention on the Law of the Sea - conservation of highly migratory fish stocks - prima facie jurisdiction - urgency - preservation of the respective rights of the parties - prevention of serious harm to the marine environment - precautionary principle
Article Abstract:
The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea ruled against Japan in Southern Bluefin Tuna, Order on Provisional Measures, giving an arbitral court jurisdiction over the dispute between Japan and New Zealand and Australia regarding the harvesting of bluefin tuna and sets fishing limits for all countries involved.
Publication Name: American Journal of International Law
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0002-9300
Year: 2000
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Arbitration - jurisdictional effect of different dispute settlement provisions in related treaties - high seas fishing - relationship between UN Convention on the Law of the Sea and specialized treaties
Article Abstract:
The author discusses the Southern Bluefin Tuna arbitration decision between Australia/New Zealand and Japan regarding Japan's attempt to unilaterally increase their take of tuna and the tribunal's attempt to interpret various treaties governing the matter.
Publication Name: American Journal of International Law
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0002-9300
Year: 2001
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
IJC under the optimal clause - relevance of legality of act to validity of reservation in jurisdiction made in contemplation of such acts - high seas - conservation and management measures
Article Abstract:
This article discusses a case before the International Court of Justice that held it lacked jurisdiction to rule on the arrest at sea by the Canadian Coast Guard of a Spanish trawler to prevent the over-fishing of Greenland halibut. Relevant points include efforts by Spain to avoid Canada's reservation to the Court's jurisdiction and Spain's argument to the Court that Canada's reservation was in conflict with international law.
Publication Name: American Journal of International Law
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0002-9300
Year: 1999
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Applicability of procedure for securing prompt release of vessels and crews under UN Convention on the Law of the Sea - burden of proof - bunkering of fishing vessels in exclusive economic zone - hot pursuit - reasonable bond
- Abstracts: U.S.-Italy extradition treaty - challenge regarding constitutionality - protection of fundamental human rights, including right to life - prohibition of death penalty in requested party's constitution - inadmissibility of assurances that death penalty shall not be imposed or enforced
- Abstracts: NATO air campaign against Yugoslavia - provisional measures - jurisdictional standard for provisional measures - optional clause jurisdiction - effect of reservation ratione temporis in declaration accepting compulsory jurisdiction - forum prorogatum - effect of reservations to article IX of Genocide Convention
- Abstracts: European Court of Human Rights - killing of persons attempting to flee the GDR - criminal law - retroactive reinterpretation - exemptions from criminal responsibility granted by repressive regimes - positive law and material justice - right to life - freedom of movement
- Abstracts: Final 367 regulations govern the treatment of section 355 distributions by U.S. corporations to foreign persons