Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Recent case holds: e-mail is minimum contact; in 'Hall,' a California court held that electronic communication created personal jurisdiction

Article Abstract:

A 1997 California appellate court decision, Hall v. LaRonde, and one in the US Court of Appeals for the 2d Circuit, Bensusan Restaurant Corp. v. King, reveal tensions between traditional personal jurisdiction law and the Internet. The former held that e-mail from New York to a California resident made the defendant liable under California personal jurisdiction, while the federal decision held a New York long arm statute did not affect a Missouri resident's Web site since the defendant was not physically present in New York when the Web site was created. Ways a Web site owner can reduce the possibility of long-arm jurisdiction are covered.

Author: Chamberlin, Carl W.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1997
Telegraph & other communications, Courts, Jurisdiction, United States, Usage, Internet, Internet service providers, Electronic mail systems, Email

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Candidates want day in court; challenge to TV ad fees

Article Abstract:

Various political candidates are trying to convince federal courts that the judiciary rather than the FCC jurisdiction to hear rebate claims. They cite the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, which allows private breach of contract suits, as a basis for the jurisdiction claim. The statutory basis for the rebate request is Section 315(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, according to which broadcasters may not charge candidates differently from the lowest rate given commercial advertisers. The political candidates claim to have been overcharged.

Author: Homan, Steve
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1992
Finance, Television and politics, Political advertising

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


A dangerous precedent

Article Abstract:

The Supreme Court ruled in United States v Alvarez-Machain that extradition treaties are but one method of transporting a person across international borders. The case concerned the kidnapping and indictment of a Mexican national for participating in the murder and torture of US drug agent Enrique Camarena. The public outcry after this decision was justified, for it is wise for the courts to be able to provide a check on police power and enforce international law.

Author: Wedgwood, Ruth
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1992
International aspects, Extradition, Kidnapping

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Cases, Personal jurisdiction
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Deconstructing contingent staffing: flexible work, constrained choice, and union initiatives. Gilmer and compulsory arbitration of employment claims in the union sector: avoiding a "distinction without a difference."
  • Abstracts: Business mediation: all in the family. Ritual and resolution: the role of reconciliation in the mediation process: lessons from a traditional Chinese village
  • Abstracts: Safety team laws may collide with the NLRA; pressure is mounting in Congress to pass legislation aimed at resolving this issue
  • Abstracts: The use of delaying tactics to obtain submarine patents and amend around a patent that a competitor has designed around
  • Abstracts: Merger of two companies is change in ownership or control for one but not the other for golden parachute purposes
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2026 Advameg, Inc.