The recline and fall of mechanical genus claim scope under "written description" in the sofa case
Article Abstract:
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Gentry Gallery, Inc. v. Berkline Corp., a 1998 case, invalidated a genus claim in a mechanical patent for a reclining sofa because the supporting disclosure did not satisfy the written description requirement on the basis that "claims may be no broader than the supporting disclosure, and, therefore, that a narrow disclosure will limit claim breadth." By the end of 1997, the "written description" requirement of 35 USC 112, paragraph one, was mainly a concern of the unpredictable arts, especially genetic materials.
Publication Name: Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0882-9098
Year: 1998
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
An (un)intended transitional provision in the GATT Act - 20 years from when?
Article Abstract:
Continuing patent applicants who file in the period on or after June 8, 1995 through Dec 31, 1995, may benefit from confusion over their patents' term dates, due to ambiguities in the GATT implementing legislation. Although it is clear that patents will have 20-year terms under GATT, the Act is unclear as to the term start date for continuing applications filed during the period in question, which ultimately may result in longer terms for these applicants. The Act's language, possibly a legislative or typographical error, may have to be clarified by the courts.
Publication Name: Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0882-9098
Year: 1995
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: The liability of raw material manufacturers: it's time to restate the Restatement
- Abstracts: The three faces of Dow Chemical. The myth of the corporate conscience. The gurus of corporate change
- Abstracts: New laws don't cancel old deals. Appeal court decision validates shady deals. High court protects habitats; a recent decision may restrict owners' rights in real property inhabited by endangered species
- Abstracts: Women battered by life and law lose twice. Courts split on sentence reduction issue. A failed utopian experiment
- Abstracts: Capping the crisis: medical malpractice and tort reform. Myth and reality: the threat of medical malpractice claims by low income women