Threats of foreign group boycotts of American industry made in response to U.S. government trade policy: illegal anticompetitive activity or protected lobbying under the Noerr-Pennington doctrine?
Article Abstract:
Group boycotts entered into by foreign companies in response to US trade policy may subject the foreign companies to attack under US antitrust laws. Foreign business might respond to such charges by claiming immunity for lobbying activities under the Noerr-Pennington doctrine, but the validity of that defense is suspect on a couple grounds. If the boycotting firms have intentionally avoided US jurisdiction, they may not be able to use the Noerr doctrine, since it is based in part on the First Amendment and right of petition. Group boycotts, while politically motivated, may not qualify as lobbying under the Noerr doctrine.
Publication Name: George Washington Journal of International Law and Economics
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0748-4305
Year: 1996
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
The sinking of the United States electronics industry within Japanese patent pools
Article Abstract:
Japanese electronic companies have pooled their patents to gain dominance in the consumer electronics market of the US. One method of reprisal to this technique is an antitrust suit such as Go-Video Inc v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. However, the US electronics industry must improve its own development of products and technologies if it is to survive. The proposed four-pronged research and development initiative by the Commerce Dept may help.
Publication Name: George Washington Journal of International Law and Economics
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0748-4305
Year: 1992
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
United States v. Nippon Paper Co.: criminal application of the Sherman Act abroad
Article Abstract:
The author discusses a decision of the 1st Circuit Court of Appeals allowing the federal government to prosecute foreign antitrust offenders, even though the charged criminal acts took place outside the US. The possible impact of the Nippon Paper decision on international relations is assessed.
Publication Name: George Washington Journal of International Law and Economics
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0748-4305
Year: 1999
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: New ALTA form expands coverage; the new American Land Title Association homeowner's policy uses simplified language and offers enhanced protection
- Abstracts: Congress revises qualified plan distribution rules. IRS provides guidance on rollover distributions and 20% withholding under 1992 Unemployment Compensation Act
- Abstracts: NAFTA to open most Mexican markets. Brazil's policy initiatives spur privatization plan. Anti-Cuba sanctions may violate NAFTA, GATT: provisions of the Helms-Burton bill penalizing dealers in seized property would impede trade
- Abstracts: Cybercasts post alternatives to videoconferencing; participants can hear and type in questions to a speaker - and can review running transcripts
- Abstracts: Paternalism and corporate responsibility. Three realms of corporate responsibility: distinguishing legitimacy, morality and ethics