Trade-secret thieves face fines, prosecution; new Economic Espionage Act and court decisions impose criminal sanctions for IP theft
Article Abstract:
The Economic Espionage Act of 1996 (EEA) and the decisions handed down by a federal district court in General Motors Corp. v. Lopez de Arriortua represent important legislative and judicial support for the protection of commercial intellectual property. The EEA has sanctions for activity constituting the misappropriation of trade secrets. The law specifies what constitutes impermissible conversion. The Lopez cases were RICO actions against a former General Motors executive who went to work for Volkswagen and misappropriated the former's proprietary data. Lopez was found guilty of wire fraud and racketeering in addition to copyright infringement.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1997
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
The federal government's war on economic espionage
Article Abstract:
The US government has taken action against economic espionage conducted by foreign intelligence agencies which increased after the close of the Cold War primarily in the high-technology and defense industries. Legislation such as the Economic Espionage Act of 1996 and many state initiatives have increased protection of trade secrets through criminal and civil penalties. Counterintelligence activities in executive agencies such as the CIA are additional means to deal with the problem. Further action can be taken in different avenues by public and private authorities.
Publication Name: University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law
Subject: Law
ISSN: 1086-7872
Year: 1997
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Economic espionage: a bad idea
Article Abstract:
Involving the CIA in industrial espionage would be misguided and create moral and legal problems. Stealing industrial trade secrets violates US patent law and international intellectual property conventions. Defining which corporations are foreign enough to merit espionage is difficult in a global economy populated largely by multinational corporations. Moreover, deciding which companies should receive the intelligence would pose moral and political problems. Passing on this information would also risk exposing classified intelligence methods and sources.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1993
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Outsider or frontrunner? Recent developments under international and European Union in international organizations and treaty bodies
- Abstracts: Toward a more diverse judiciary: the ABA needs to look at its process of evaluating nominees for the bench. Under the congressional microscope: Judicial Conference responds to senator's request to curb judiciary's expenses
- Abstracts: Are the Commissioner of Taxation's recovery powers fettered by state moratorium and limitation of actions legislation?
- Abstracts: The difference between mediation and conciliation. Labor & employment arbitration: questions for the late '90s
- Abstracts: Practical tips for using risk analysis in mediation. Using evaluations in mediation