Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

U.S.-Japan Semiconductor Agreement

Article Abstract:

The US-Japan Semiconductor Agreement was renewed once again on Aug. 2, 1996. The American and Japanese governments first agreed to regulate trade in semiconductors among companies in their respective nations in 1986 and renewed this agreement in 1991. The upside of the latest accord is that is does not specify market share targets or trade controls. However, its upside is that it increases government interference that undermines freedom of trade.

Author: Hudgins, Edward L.
Publisher: Cato Institute
Publication Name: Regulation
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0147-0590
Year: 1996
Semiconductors and related devices, Semiconductor Devices, Semiconductor and Related Device Manufacturing, Administration of General Economic Programs, Trade Regulations NEC, United States, Semiconductor industry, Interpretation and construction, Japan, International trade, Japanese foreign relations, United States foreign relations, International trade regulation

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


State regulatory measures

Article Abstract:

Measuring state regulations and comparing the costs among the various states is a difficult task. Still, the resulting information could focus the attention of the public and policymakers on both the state role in regulation and the direction that reform should take. As states seek freedom from self-imposed regulations, they will eventually serve as valuable allies for those fighting the battle in Washington.

Author: Hudgins, Edward L.
Publisher: Cato Institute
Publication Name: Regulation
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0147-0590
Year: 1996
Public Administration, State & Local Government, Evaluation, Delegated legislation, State government, State (Political science)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Handicapping freedom: the Americans with Disabilities Act

Article Abstract:

The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) was strongly supported in both houses of Congress. The support for the bill was due largely to legislators' desire to protect disabled Americans from being discriminated upon by potential employers. Despite its noble objectives, the ADA can be cited as a good example of the evils of regulation. Congress should consider reforming, if not repealing, the ADA.

Author: Hudgins, Edward L.
Publisher: Cato Institute
Publication Name: Regulation
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0147-0590
Year: 1995
Administration of Urban Planning and Community and Rural Development, Handicapped Persons Access, Disabled persons, United States. Congress, Access for the disabled

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Laws, regulations and rules
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Securing a durable mediation agreement to settle complex employment disputes. Arbitrability, preemption, and preclusion: developing issues in age discrimination claims
  • Abstracts: Economic aspects of payment card systems and antitrust policy toward joint ventures. The antitrust economics of credit card networks: reply to Evans and Schmalensee comment
  • Abstracts: No: an eye on government. No: tabloid television does not belong at trial. Yes: cameras reflect the process, for better or worse
  • Abstracts: IS and the virtual office. IS managers are not dead. How many IS people should you have?
  • Abstracts: 'Free exercise' revisited. Prosecutors tread where defenders daren't go. Clinton v. Starr v. Clinton may make court act
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2026 Advameg, Inc.