Too politically correct? Lawyer defends his book chronicling the validity of the black rage defense
Article Abstract:
Paul Harris is the architect of the black rage defense, which contends that past injustices cause a black defendant to act out insanely, with diminished capacity or in self-defense. Harris is the author of the book, 'Black Rage Confronts the Law,' giving the history of this defense strategy and is the son of labor activists, his father having been bodyguard to the black actor Paul Robeson.
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1997
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Seeking a fix for election law; panelists say First Amendment protections may block reform efforts
Article Abstract:
Expert panels at the ABA Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice Section's fall 1997 meeting discussed campaign finance reform, which tends to involve limits on soft money contributions. This limit regulates speech, and freedom of speech is a constitutional right. Until voters cast ballot because of positions on campaign finance, there might not be any reform.
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1997
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Constitutional structure and judicial deference to agency interpretations of agency rules. Informational standing under the NEPA: justiciability and the environmental decisionmaking process
- Abstracts: Is it time to give the S corporation a proper burial? The partnership allocation rules of section 704(b): to be or not to be
- Abstracts: Land use regulations and the Takings Clause: are courts applying a tougher standard to regulators after Nollan?
- Abstracts: International intellectual property dispute resolution: is mediation a sleeping giant?
- Abstracts: Macro comparisons at the country level. Cross-country comparisons at the industry sector level. Can process claims that include new and unobvious product limitations still be obvious after In re Ochiai?