Underreporting defects is risky
Article Abstract:
Failure to comply with the Consumer Product Safety Act's Section 15 requirements that 'substantial product hazards be reported to the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) can mean large criminal and civil penalties, and due to these companies should always err in the direction of reporting. Some courts even feel there is a private right of action for noncompliance with the Section 15 requirements. Underreporting is thought to be widespread, and many fears companies have about reporting are unwarranted. Reports to the CPSC are confidential and are not an admission that a product is defective.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1992
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Under its amnesty program, the Consumer Product Safety Commission will waive penalties for firms that disclose previously unreported product hazards
Article Abstract:
A special program, offering amnesty to consumer products manufacturers that reveal past compliance failures or start corrective action, will end Feb 13, 1996. The US Consumer Product Safety Commission announced the program in Aug 1995 to reduce the level of non-compliance due to fear of penalties, but so far the amnesty program has seen little use. A waiver of official product hazard determination, offered to manufacturers that begin a corrective action program within 20 days of reporting a potential problem, is more popular.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1996
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
The current federal product-safety requirements for reporting potentially dangerous products have caused confusion among the nation's manufacturers
Article Abstract:
Congress should amend the statutes covering product safety, the Consumer Product Safety Act, the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act and the Medical Device Amendment of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act in view of their subjectivity and the widespread problem of underreporting. Objective criteria should become the basis for a reporting definition. A provision exempting safety reports from use in all private products liability actions would also induce more reporting.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1998
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Although obligations to arbitrate generally are viewed as requiring consent, in a variety of instances courts have held that non-signatories are similarly bound
- Abstracts: Niche marketing helps firms reach new clients: a winning strategy will match the strengths of attorneys with the needs of a targeted market
- Abstracts: Downward departures from the Federal Sentencing Guidelines based on the defendant's drug rehabilitative efforts
- Abstracts: Using home equity for retirement income. Planning for retirement: defined benefit plans and planner due diligence
- Abstracts: Insider law examined in Europe; key Swiss case. Third parties benefit from some rulings: courts will issue releases and injunctions favorable to nondebtors if certain factors such as 'identity of interest' are present