Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Vicarious and other non-primary liability

Article Abstract:

A number of 1995 court decisions addressed the issue of franchisors' non-primary or vicarious liability in conjunction with franchisees' acts or alleged negligence. In a Missouri case, the franchisor was considered liable for failure to properly train franchisee employees as well as for problems in facility design. However, franchisors won liability cases in Vermont and California that focused on responsibility for liquor service in a franchised restaurant and a constructive discharge claim, respectively.

Author: Lambert, Kim A., Loewinger, Andrew P., Conison, Jay
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Franchise Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 8756-7962
Year: 1996
Liability (Law), Legal liability, Respondeat superior

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Bankrupcty

Article Abstract:

The 1995 Printonics case held that a debtor-franchisee remained bound by a post-termination covenant not to compete despite the franchisee's bankruptcy, because the franchisee's rejection of the franchise agreement did not constitute actual termination of it. The 1995 Egyptian Brothers Donut case rejected the debtor-franchisees' automatic stay motion to block a pre-petition franchise agreement termination and held that the franchisor was entitled to possession of the stores at issue.

Author: Lambert, Kim A., Loewinger, Andrew P., Conison, Jay
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Franchise Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 8756-7962
Year: 1996
Business Failures, Interpretation and construction, Bankruptcy law

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


In land mark decision, Supreme Court holds trade dress to be protected without proof of secondary meaning

Article Abstract:

The US Supreme Court has held that trade dress, which includes such things as decor and uniforms, may be protected from appropriation by a competitor even if it is not demonstrated to be firmly associated with the business of origin in the public's mind. The case centered around two restaurants, Two Pesos and Taco Cabana, which featured nearly identical decor. Plaintiff Taco Cabana's claim against Two Pesos was upheld.

Author: Lambert, Kim A., Loewinger, Andrew P.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Franchise Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 8756-7962
Year: 1992
Rules of origin (International trade), Rules of origin, Financial disclosure

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Cases, Laws, regulations and rules, Commercial law, Franchises
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The Restatement (Third) of Torts and its effects on products liability law. The nature and impact of the Restatement (Third) of Torts: products liability s. 10; post-sale duty to warn
  • Abstracts: Campus speech; funding is non-public forum. Joplin lives; publicity right rejected. Fighting words?
  • Abstracts: Gun sale, owner liability grows. Border birth defects spur suits. Breast implant suits pouring in; after $25 million verdict
  • Abstracts: Detroit to offer marketing course; will other institutions follow suit? Chicago-Kent professor teaches the first no-book legal course
  • Abstracts: Presidential policies and the law. Withholding consent: Senate judiciary chair says he won't approve activist judges
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2026 Advameg, Inc.