Does moving dissolve duality? Relocating out of state may invalidate original law license in some ways
Article Abstract:
Ethical do's and don't's for lawyers relocating to another state who wish to keep their original law license by going on inactive status are discussed. Procedure for gaining admission to the bar of a new state is also covered.
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 2000
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Walking a fine line; when a partner is impaired or deceitful, be careful in telling the firm's clients
Article Abstract:
The ethical bind faced by lawyers considering telling clients that a colleague is impaired or has been deceitful is discussed. A balance between the desire to protect colleagues and protection for the law firm is advised.
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 2001
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Proceed with caution
Article Abstract:
Consulting another lawyer, a mitigating factor in determining punishment for ethics violations, dis discussed. The mitigating attempt must come early in the game, as timing is an important element.
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1999
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: The breaking point; a hiatus can help lawyers step back and reflect on what is important to them. No workout time? No sweat; with a little effort, lawyers can fit fitness into hectic schedules
- Abstracts: Uncle Sam no longer struck blind by heir's disclaimer to defeat tax liens. IRS rules on QTIP IRA and conduit trust
- Abstracts: What happens when nothing is happening? Mellinger acquiescence and not much else. Themes for 2000: IRS toils while Congress spins
- Abstracts: Conceiving solutions; model act to address issues raised by fertilization methods. Model act on hold
- Abstracts: The counter-attack; other side's surprise can put you on the defensive. Spoliation stinks; destruction of evidence calls for a strong response