Why we stopped doing primary prevention for gay men in 1985
Article Abstract:
The introduction of a accurate test to determine HIV infected status in 1985 ended any reasonable attempts at primary prevention in the gay community because the AIDS education groups adopted a social rather than practical position. In an attempt to minimize the stigmatism attached to being HIV positive, all education specifically targeted at HIV negative gay men was eliminated because of its potential for increasing the pressure on HIV positive gay men. As it was, the gay community split into HIV positives and negatives because it was safer, physically and emotionally, to have relationships with those of similar HIV status. The AIDS prevention efforts failed to provide a health-oriented response to the crisis because of the wish not to hurt those already infected.
Publication Name: AIDS & Public Policy Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0887-3852
Year: 1995
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Potential barriers to the adoption of an HIV vaccine by at-risk individuals
Article Abstract:
The focus on developing an HIV vaccine has failed to account for or combat the likely distrust of the vaccine by the public as shown by a comparison to public perception of the hepatitis-B vaccine. Specific barriers include failure to recognize risk, concern about vaccine-contracted infection, distrust of government and conspiracy theories about AIDS and concern about discrimination because of testing positive for HIV antibodies. Some possible methods to encourage support of the vaccine include AIDS education about risk factors, support of opinion leaders from at-risk communities, confidentiality, affordability of the vaccine and promotion in non-minority communities.
Publication Name: AIDS & Public Policy Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0887-3852
Year: 1995
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Determining allocations for HIV-prevention interventions: assessing a change in federal funding policy
Article Abstract:
Fiscal data from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Grants Management Information System and reports from CDC-funded state and local health departments were analyzed to compare the allocation levels for specific interventions for FY 1993 with FY 1996. The aggregate federal HIV-prevention allocation for 1996 was $216,165,022, whereas, for 1993, the total was $157,188,492. Significant increases were also found in the number of federal resources intended to promote health education and risk-reduction programs for FY 1996 compared to FY 1993.
Publication Name: AIDS & Public Policy Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0887-3852
Year: 1997
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Employer speech, union representation elections, and the First Amendment. Resurrecting the National Labor Relations Act - plant closings and runaway shops in a global economy
- Abstracts: What price resignation? Leaving the ABA over abortion is not morally necessary. Differences of opinion
- Abstracts: IRS issues field directive on payment of CAP sanctions from trust assets. DOL institutes Delinquent Filer Voluntary Compliance Program (DFVC)
- Abstracts: Liberalismo contra democracia: recent judicial reform in Mexico. On extrajudicial constitutional interpretation
- Abstracts: Setting up your first Web page. Environmental regulations on CD-ROM. Lawyers on the Web