A normative regulatory framework for computer matching
Article Abstract:
Computer matching is a popular way to detect errors, fraud and misdemeanors but needs strict regulation to prevent improper use, avoid incorrect prosecutions and protect privacy. The dangers involved in data surveillance include that the information may be wrong; it inequitably targets those who have more information in computers such as federal employees or welfare recipients; and it violates privacy, due process and the belief that data given for one purpose will not be used for another. Though the method is effective and efficient, proper regulation is necessary.
Publication Name: The John Marshall Journal of Computer & Information Law
Subject: Library and information science
ISSN: 1078-4128
Year: 1995
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
The invention and future of the computer
Article Abstract:
John V. Atanasoff designed the modern computer in the late 1930's although his contribution is not widely recognized. Atanasoff agreed with Iowa State college officials to patent his machine but the Pearl Harbor invasion and the US declaration of war intervened. The college abandoned the patent application, Atanasoff's machine was never patented and the design became part of the public domain. Two books written in 1988 recognized Atanasoff's contribution. A critique of Bill Gates' vision of computers' future social impact is given.
Publication Name: The John Marshall Journal of Computer & Information Law
Subject: Library and information science
ISSN: 1078-4128
Year: 1996
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
How can Whelan v. Jaslow and Lotus v. Borland both be right? Reexamining the economics of computer software reuse
Article Abstract:
Federal courts disagree on whether computer software makers should be able to copyright programs yet retain the right to reuse them. The 3d Circuit extended broad copyright protection to reuse, while the 1st Circuit gave it practically no protection. An economic model that uses economic based decision factors to analyze differing outcomes of copyright infringement suits may help resolve these discrepancies while allowing software authors the maximum protection to their investments.
Publication Name: The John Marshall Journal of Computer & Information Law
Subject: Library and information science
ISSN: 1078-4128
Year: 1999
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Simple regulatory policies in the presence of demand and cost uncertainty
- Abstracts: A test for information sharing in Cournot oligopoly. Collaboration, peer review and open source software. Peer - to - peer file sharing communities
- Abstracts: Thermal imaging and the Fourth Amendment: Pushing the Katz test towards terminal velocity. Warrantless satellite surveillance: will our 4th Amendment privacy rights be lost in space?