Court rules teachers are public officials
Article Abstract:
The Connecticut Supreme Court has ruled that in libel cases teachers are to be considered public officials and as such actual malice must be shown to sustain a charge of libel. A teacher sued school board members, parents and a former student for statements they made outside the confines of the state board of education, arguing that such statements were not privileged and that the malice standard for teachers was unfair. The court disagreed, citing the public responsibility teachers have and the public's interest in teachers' qualifications.
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1992
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Privilege covering statement at council hearings not absolute; statements unrelated to matter discussed or known to be false not protected
Article Abstract:
The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled in Vultaggio v. Yasko that libelous statements made by members of the public at city council hearings were protected by only a conditional, not an absolute privilege and that this privilege did not cover libelous statements unrelated to the matter being discussed at the meeting. The conditional privilege offers adequate protection to the witness, yet still gives the injured party the chance to secure redress in a libel action.
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1998
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Singer's divorce is matter of legitimate public concern: court won't second-guess newsworthiness of 'economic spousal abuse'
Article Abstract:
The New York Court of Appeals ruled in Huggins v. Moore that the divorce of singer Melba Moore from husband Charles Huggins was a matter of legitimate public interest and proof of gross negligence was needed to sustain a libel case against a newspaper reporting on the divorce.
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 2000
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Let's go to the tape.... State high court rules trial court cannot close hearings to media based on 'speculation' on fair trial impact
- Abstracts: Court refuses to set "libel by implication" standard. English libel judgment found repugnant to U.S., state law: state high court refuses to enforce claim in dispute between two former Soviet citizens
- Abstracts: Court approves closing of jury selection. Maryland court strikes down trial closure. Courts allow order requiring journalists to sign secrecy agreement