Court says broad statistical response would invade someone's privacy
Article Abstract:
The Delaware Supreme Court ruled in Gannett Co. v. State Criminal Justice Information System that the agency's compiled criminal statistics, if made public to the press, could violate privacy rights.
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 2000
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Justices will decide depth of exemption: feds argue tribal comments are confidential under act
Article Abstract:
The author discusses arguments in Dept of the Interior v. Klamath Water Users protective Ass'n before the US Supreme Court, in which the court was asked to consider whether Native American tribal governments qualified for the Freedom of Information Act intra- or inter-agency exemption.
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 2001
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Open record request wins unanimous approval: the first Freedom of Information Act victory at the Supreme Court in eight years reins in a government attempt to broaden the scope of the agency deliberations exemption
Article Abstract:
The author discusses the US Supreme Court's unanimous decision in Department of the Interior v. Klamath Water Users Protective Ass'n, in which the court ruled the agency's records with a Native American tribe were not exempt from the Freedom of Information Act.
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 2001
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: One opinion spoils spirit of federal access law: since '89, agencies have relied on the Supreme Court in Reporters Committee to curtail press access with the approval of courts
- Abstracts: The messenger at risk: a case in the hands of the Supreme Court will determine liability of one who reports newsworthy events without checking legality of the source
- Abstracts: "Can we tape?" A journalist's guide to taping phone calls and in-person conversations in the 50 states and D.C
- Abstracts: Editorial on transportation company ruled 'opinion': court also upholds tough standard for proving 'defamation by implication'
- Abstracts: Public concern outweighs privacy: High Court sides with press when school officials sued over recorded phone call