Reformer does not have right of court access: sought court transcript to determine why defense lawyer was disqualified
Article Abstract:
The 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, in McMinn v. United States, rejected a law reform advocate's request to unseal the transcript of a hearing in which a public defender was disqualified from representing a drug defendant. The court stated that individual members of the public have no constitutional right to gain access to criminal proceedings unless they can show that they had suffered a concrete and particularized injury in the case. The advocate's reason for seeking access, which was based on a First Amendment right of access, did not meet this test.
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1999
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Court rules presumption of access to judicial documents should be weighed against centrality to issues litigated
Article Abstract:
A three-judge panel of the US Circuit Court of Appeals in New York ruled in Dec 1995 that a lower court should not have made public the first part of a judicial report on an investigation into labor union corruption and set out new guidelines for public access to such reports. The new rules weigh the presumption of public access against the interests of judicial efficiency and law enforcement and the privacy interests of those resisting disclosure. The decision came on the case's second appeal to the circuit court.
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1996
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Court limits anonymity of jurors in beating case
Article Abstract:
The US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit ruled in Associated Press v. District Court that the jury selection questionnaires, for the Rodney King civil rights trial, could be sealed. The court stated the questionnaires could be sealed during trial and for a certain amount of time afterwards, but not indefinitely. The court felt they should be released when they no longer pose a threat to jurors on the case.
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1993
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Let's go to the tape.... State high court rules trial court cannot close hearings to media based on 'speculation' on fair trial impact
- Abstracts: Reporter loses appeal of contempt finding: but judge rescinds order after Decker says gag not violated. American professor guilty of contempt for 'scandalizing' Singapore judiciary
- Abstracts: Shield law does not apply if reporter is witness. Reporter protected in shield law's first test. Shield law passes in Florida; S.C. assembly weighs bill
- Abstracts: Court orders state board to ignore sunshine law in testimony before federal monitoring committee. Court orders release of harassment report