Double jeopardy and the use of QALYs in health care allocation
Article Abstract:
The use of Quality Adjusted Life-Years (QALY) to allocate health care has been criticised as rationing that penalizes disabled or permanently ill persons. QALY places permanently handicapped people lower on the scale than the physically normal ones. Depending on the medical situation, the QALY puts more value on the treatment for a handicapped person over a normal person since the benefits of treatment for the handicapped person may be greater when the cost is the same. When the benefit from the treatment is the same for both, the normal person is given priority on the QALY scale.
Publication Name: Journal of Medical Ethics
Subject: Philosophy and religion
ISSN: 0306-6800
Year: 1995
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Straw men with broken legs: a response to Per Sundstrom
Article Abstract:
The advocacy of eugenics and euthanasia under the circumstances of severely disabled newborns or genetic counseling to prevent the conception of disabled newborns was misunderstood by Per Sundstrom and some Germans who opinioned that a person has no right to value one life higher than the other. However this controversy has been removed by indicating that the ethical issue of eugenics and euthanasia depends upon the condition of the patient.
Publication Name: Journal of Medical Ethics
Subject: Philosophy and religion
ISSN: 0306-6800
Year: 1995
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Double jeopardy and the veil of ignorance - a reply
Article Abstract:
The Quality Adjusted Life-Year (QALY) scale, and other similar methods that link quality of life to life expectancy, use it for determining specific allocations of health care finances. Although the defenders of QALY claim the equality of all beings, they implicitly attach different values to all lives. QALY also needs a large and comprehensive data collection. Problems related to such large data collections are highlighted.
Publication Name: Journal of Medical Ethics
Subject: Philosophy and religion
ISSN: 0306-6800
Year: 1995
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Protecting communities in health research from exploitation. Editorial
- Abstracts: Double-trouble: combining business and ethics. The feminine firm: a comment. Leadership: a discussion about ethics
- Abstracts: Paid organ donation - the Grey Basket concept. Xenotransplantation. Doing harm: living organ donors, clinical research and 'The Tenth Man'
- Abstracts: Doctors should not try to ban boxing - but boxing's own ethics suggests reform. Covert surveillance by doctors for life-threatening Munchausen's syndrome by proxy