The continuing debate over risk-related standards of competence

Article Abstract:

In assessing risk-related standards of competence, it is more important to focus on cognitive ability than performance. Patients may be mentally functional but unable to properly evaluate situations and make decisions. Standards of competence must therefore be directed at examining evidence that patients are capable of reasoning and weighing consequences.

Author: Wicclair, Mark R.
Testing, Cognition, Cognitive tests

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Risk-related standards of competence

Article Abstract:

The asymmetrical competence model continues to undermine the model of risk-related standard of competence. While some theorists equivocate two senses of competence, those of competence to complete a task and competence in completing a task, this process fails to address issues such as objective evaluation, benevolent intervention and individual autonomy.

Author: Cale, Gita S.

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Asymmetrical competence

Article Abstract:

Asymmetrical competence is a necessary tool for assessing a patient's capability to make decisions. Since the levels of risks associated with different treatments vary greatly, different levels of competence should therefore be required. By focusing on situation outcomes as well as patients' capabilities, quality of care can be enhanced.

Author: Wilks, Ian

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Models, United States, Evaluation, Criticism and interpretation, Employee performance appraisals, Performance appraisals, Bioethics, Performance standards, Job performance standards
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.