Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Political science

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Political science

How do the courts really discover unenumerated fundamental rights? Cataloguing the methods of judicial alchemy

Article Abstract:

A pluralistic approach may be the best method for discovering unenumerated fundamental rights, as no single method could encompass the text and history of the Constitution, as well as Supreme Court precedent and due process concerns. Judicial constraint should be combined with both positive arguments for rights and negative arguments stressing the problems of strict scrutiny. The current process rather resembles a form of alchemy based on the personal inclinations of the judge selected to write the opinion, a system that could benefit from a more explicitly pluralistic approach.

Author: Crump, David
Publisher: Harvard Society for Law and Public Policy, Inc.
Publication Name: Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 0193-4872
Year: 1996
Cases, Civil rights

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Judicial review and federalism

Article Abstract:

Judicial review as well as politics must prevail under federalism to protect states' rights. The Supreme Court, in Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority, endorsed the political safeguards theory of federalism, which holds that the states must use political means to resist encroachment by the federal government. However, the Framers expected that judicial review and politics would work together to protect liberty by preventing an overly efficient federal government.

Author: Yoo, John C.
Publisher: Harvard Society for Law and Public Policy, Inc.
Publication Name: Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 0193-4872
Year: 1998
United States, Laws, regulations and rules, Federalism, Judicial review

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA



Subjects list: United States, Interpretation and construction, Constitutional law, Constitutional interpretation
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Nicaragua: is the revolution over? The gendered effects of the reregulation of the Swedish welfare state. Incomplete revolutions: gendered participation in productive and reproductive labour in Mozambique and Nicaragua
  • Abstracts: How did the Virginians ground religious rights? Political liberalism and asymmetrical rights for minority comprehensive doctrines
  • Abstracts: Reforming the postcommunist university. Controlling the military: a partial success. The postcommunist wars
  • Abstracts: The scope and constitutionality of judicial review under the Tunney Act. Tilting the table: collective bargaining after National Baseball Ass'n v. Williams
  • Abstracts: The dead hand of the architect. Does public choice theory justify judicial activism after all?
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2026 Advameg, Inc.