Speaking in tongues: whose rights at stake? Yniguez v. Arizonans for Official English, 69 F.3d 920 (9th Cir. 1995) (en banc)
Article Abstract:
The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled in Yniguez v. Arizonans for Official English that Amendment XXVIII of the state constitution violated the free speech rights of a bilingual public employee by insisting that she only speak in English to non-English-speaking clients. The Court decided the case by characterizing the employee's speech as public concern speech, entitled to greater protection. Instead of expanding free speech rights of employees, the court should have focused on the denial of access to the government that results as a result of an artificial language barrier.
Publication Name: Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 0193-4872
Year: 1996
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Speech, privacy, and the power of the purse: lessons from the abortion "gag rule" case
Article Abstract:
The Supreme Court has declared that the US government's ban on abortion counselling at all federally-funded family planning conflicts does not violate privacy rights or the First Amendment's guarantee of free speech. Rust v. Sullivan concerned the Health and Human Services Department's regulations forbidding abortion referrals at any clinic to which it gives funds. The ruling probably means that future disputes over government-supported medical programs will be settled politically rather than judicially.
Publication Name: Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 0361-6878
Year: 1992
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Financing universal health insurance: taxes, premiums, and the lessons of social insurance
Article Abstract:
Social insurance might allay the American public's distaste for higher taxes that has so far prevented the enactment of universal health insurance. The success of social insurance in Germany, Britain and other countries shows that such programs can be both mandatory like taxes and focused on health care like insurance premiums. Americans would be likely to support social insurance once they are convinced that it is more like social security than like welfare.
Publication Name: Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 0361-6878
Year: 1992
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Assessing the risks. New nukes, nukes for all, or no nukes? American-Russian strategic relations: from confrontation to cooperation?
- Abstracts: Germany: moving towards a new Ostpolitik? Choices change for Germany. Germany: power at any price
- Abstracts: Of rights and duties: a Jeffersonian dialogue. Mobilising Earth First! in Britain. 'The earth belongs to the living': Thomas Jefferson and the problem of intergenerational relations
- Abstracts: From green to brown: the Australian federal election of March 1996. The social responsibility of labour versus the environmental impact of property capital: The Australian Green Bans Movement
- Abstracts: Fictitious capital, real debts: Systemic illiquidity in the financial crises of the late 1990s. The impact of fiscal constitutions on state and local expenditures