Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Psychology and mental health

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Psychology and mental health

Jealousy and rational responses to infidelity across gender and culture

Article Abstract:

Sexual infidelity is more acceptable and less bothersome for people belonging to cultures with less sanctions on extramarital sex, as compared to cultures with strict sanctions on adultery. Both sexual and emotional infidelity is equally troubling for men and women. The evolutionary theory fails to explain why emotional infidelity is more bothersome to some men. However, the double-shot hypothesis is appropriate in explaining these sex differences. People who believe that sex implies emotional involvement are more likely to be troubled by sexual infidelity.

Author: Christenfeld, Nicholas, Harris, Christine R.
Publisher: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Publication Name: Psychological Science
Subject: Psychology and mental health
ISSN: 0956-7976
Year: 1996

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Genes, jealousy, and the replication of misspecified models

Article Abstract:

The extent to which one infidelity type is believed to imply the other determines the type of infidelity which is more distressing for the individual. However, this belief may vary between sexes and among cultures. The replication of findings across cultures lends support to the evolutionary hypothesis. However, there fails to be any evidence for the evolutionary basis of the psychological mechanism involved in the choice of the infidelity type.

Author: Salovey, Peter, DeSteno, David A.
Publisher: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Publication Name: Psychological Science
Subject: Psychology and mental health
ISSN: 0956-7976
Year: 1996

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Evolutionary origins of sex differences in jealousy?: questioning the 'fitness' of the model

Article Abstract:

The perception of the non-independence of emotional and sexual infidelity determines the relation between sex and the choice of the jealousy-provoking infidelity. The evolutionary theory, which considers this difference to be innate and fitness enhancing, may fail to provide a proper explanation of the relation between sex and jealousy. The choice between sexual infidelity and and emotional infidelity is a false dichotomy for individuals.

Author: Salovey, Peter, DeSteno, David A.
Publisher: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Publication Name: Psychological Science
Subject: Psychology and mental health
ISSN: 0956-7976
Year: 1996
Sex differences (Psychology)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Psychological aspects, Research, Adultery, Jealousy, Perception, Perception (Psychology)
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Perceptual, conceptual, and representational processes in infancy. The role of object recognition in young infants' object segregation
  • Abstracts: The real self and psychic interiority: a response to Drs. Paris, Horner, and Spero. 'Cast Away' and the creation of the dialogic other - the apostrophe
  • Abstracts: The national registry of evidence-based programs and practices. Integrated dual disorder treatment
  • Abstracts: Balancing autonomy and risk: a failure of nerve in England and Wales? Loathing the sinner, medicalizing the sin: why sexually violent predator statutes are unjust
  • Abstracts: Interpersonal attachment cognitions and prediction of symptomatic responses to interpersonal stress. Dimensions of dysfunctional attitudes as vulnerabilities to depressive symptoms
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.