Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Social sciences

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Social sciences

Strategic issue analysis: NGT + decision analysis for resolving strategic issues

Article Abstract:

This article discusses how nominal group technique (NGT) can be combined with a decision analysis (DA) technique - simple multi-attribute utility - to assist decision makers in dealing with strategic issues. The authors identify a stepwise means of guiding such complex, 'messy' issues through multiple levels so that organization-level alternatives can be considered without sacrificing unit-specific needs. A detailed case study is presented in which an organization consisting of many independently functioning divisions and subdivisions used NGT + DA along with group decision methodology to devise and choose from among alternatives for an integrated computer system. The organization was able to achieve consensus as to the system adopted, and informal and survey feedback from participants indicates their satisfaction with the process. The authors conclude that NGT + DA is relatively easy and inexpensive to use and transparent to the user, and call for research to assess its relative strengths compared to other combined techniques using NGT. (Reprinted by permission of the publisher.)

Author: McDaniel, Reuben R., Jr., Thomas, James B., Dooris, Michael J.
Publisher: Sage Publications, Inc.
Publication Name: Journal of Applied Behavioral Science
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0021-8863
Year: 1989
Methods, Decision-making, Group, Group decision making, Psychology, Applied, Applied psychology

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The use of decision analysis for organizational design: reorganizing a community hospital

Article Abstract:

Organizational design is presented as a decision process, with specific structures seen as providing alternative choices. To illustrate this, the authors present the case of a major metropolitan hospital that used the process to coordinate service delivery (nursing care versus patient care) and service focus (product oriented versus function oriented). Through interviews with more than 40 hospital administrators and staff, the authors created a list of 20 attributes, and used simple multi-attribute utility analysis to generate six design alternatives. The decision makers unanimously chose one alternative, even though potential for significant conflict existed because of differing values and objectives. The authors find decision analytic techniques useful for both the problem formulation and for generating and evaluating structural alternatives, and conclude that in this case consensus was facilitated by the decision process used. (Reprinted by permission of the publisher.)

Author: McDaniel, Reuben R., Jr., Thomas, James B., Ashmos, Donde P., Smith, Judith P.
Publisher: Sage Publications, Inc.
Publication Name: Journal of Applied Behavioral Science
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0021-8863
Year: 1987
Organizational change, Hospitals, Hospital administration

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Differences in perception of strategic decision-making processes: the case of physicians and administrators

Article Abstract:

Understanding the differences in perceptions among organization leaders of the strategic decision-making process and who participates in it can help leaders manage potential conflict. Although differences in perception occur because of differences in roles and group membership, these differences in perception may be exacerbated by the content of the decision itself and by the generic strategy of the organization. In a study of hospital strategic decision making, findings show that the decision makers' roles, the content of the strategic decision, and, in some cases, the generic strategic strategy of the organization affect differences in perception of the extent to which physicians participate in strategic decision making. Findings also show that decision makers may agree about who participates, but not about how physicians participate. Implications for managers are discussed. (Reprinted by permission of the publisher.)

Author: McDaniel, Reuben R., Jr., Duchon, Dennis, Ashmos, Donde P.
Publisher: Sage Publications, Inc.
Publication Name: Journal of Applied Behavioral Science
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0021-8863
Year: 1990
Planning, Case studies, Physicians, Medical professions, Perception, Perception (Psychology), Hospital administrators

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Research, Decision-making, Decision making, Management
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Comparative analysis of goal-setting strategies across cultures. Participative goal-setting: social, motivational, and cognitive factors
  • Abstracts: Memory factors in advertising: the effect of advertising retrieval cues on brand evaluations. Consumer learning: advertising and the ambiguity of product experience
  • Abstracts: Social ties and word-of-mouth referral behavior. Purchasing behavior in embedded markets. The value priority hypotheses for consumer budget plans
  • Abstracts: The effects of commercials for adult products on children. Happy and sad TV programs: how they affect reactions to commercials
  • Abstracts: Consumer responses to advertising: the effects of ad content, emotions, and attitude toward the ad on viewing time
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2023 Advameg, Inc.