Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Sociology and social work

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Sociology and social work

Assessing capriciousness in capital cases

Article Abstract:

The amount of variation in prosecutors' decisions to charge or not charge a particular person with a capital offense may not be a result of chance. The unexplained variance is usually attributed to chance, but it may be that other, unexamined but legitimate factors operate. An analysis of the charges filed in San Francisco indicates that similar cases are treated similarly. The process more closely resembles a conditional lottery based on past criminal behavior and the type of crime, than a pure lottery.

Author: Paternoster, Raymond
Publisher: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Publication Name: Law & Society Review
Subject: Sociology and social work
ISSN: 0023-9216
Year: 1993
Berk, Richard A., Weiss, Robert, Boger, Jack

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Rejoinder

Article Abstract:

Professor Raymond Paternoster believes that there is one model for the criminal justice system when capital punishment sentences are considered and that death sentences are applied on the basis of many factors. Paternoster agrees with the theory that the process of charging is stochastic which means the justice system is not really based on hard fact. Therefore, there is an element of chance in sentencing based on decisions made by the prosecutor, judge or jury.

Author: Berk, Richard A., Boger, Jack, Weiss, Robert
Publisher: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Publication Name: Law & Society Review
Subject: Sociology and social work
ISSN: 0023-9216
Year: 1993
Paternoster, Raymond

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Avoidance and misunderstanding: a rejoinder to McDowell et al

Article Abstract:

The 1992 research on Washington D.C.'s gun control law conducted by David McDowell, Brian Wiersema, and Colin Loftin, and their subsequent defense of their conclusions, do not hold up to analysis based on a more appropriate intervention model specification and time series. Their interpretation and use of interrupted time series design data led to incorrect conclusions regarding the effect of the gun control law.

Author: Britt, Chester L., Bordua, David J., Kleck, Gary
Publisher: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Publication Name: Law & Society Review
Subject: Sociology and social work
ISSN: 0023-9216
Year: 1996
Research, Laws, regulations and rules, Firearms, Washington, D.C., Gun laws, Gun control, McDowall, David, Wiersema, Brian, Loftin, Colin

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Analysis, Planning, Statistics, Criticism and interpretation, Capital punishment, Criminal justice, Administration of, Administration of criminal justice, Prosecution
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Assessing depression in childhood and adolescence: a guide for social work practice. Using attachment theory when placing siblings in foster care
  • Abstracts: Science friction: cervical cancer and the contesting of medical beliefs. Apostasy to orthodoxy: debates before a Commission of Inquiry into chiropractic
  • Abstracts: Situating legal consciousness: experiences and attitudes of ordinary citizens about law and street harassment
  • Abstracts: Aggressive political opinions and exposure to violent media. The notion of convergence as an epistemological base for evaluating the effect of violent TV programming on psychologically normal children
  • Abstracts: Self as an epistemic authority: effects on experiential and instructional learning. part 2 Perceptions of self-affect: now and in the future
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.