The politics of social work research

Article Abstract:

A criticism of John T. Pardeck and Roland G. Meinert's claim that the contributing editors of Social Work lack a record of scholarly productivity is given. Social work organizations promote work driven by politics rather than content and the latent role of the journal's editorial board is political gatekeeping, resulting in a lack of intellectual diversity in the journal.

---

Social work scholarship and gatekeeping: reflection on the debate

Article Abstract:

The claim of John T. Pardeck and Roland G. Meinert that editorial members of Social work lack a record of scholarly productivity to the journal is criticized. A broader view of scholarship including books and anthology chapters and consideration of a more substantial time period may have come up with a different result.

Pardeck, JohnT.

---

Scholarship, inclusiveness, and Social Work

Article Abstract:

A defemse pf the contributing editors of Social Work is given in response to John T. Pardeck and Roland G. Meinert's attack on their scholarly productivity.

Similar abstracts:

• Abstracts: The institute for the advancement of social work research: Working to increase our practice and policy evidence base
• Abstracts: The immigrant household and spatial assimilation: Partnership, nativity, and neighborhood location. The gendered connection between ethnic residential and labor-market segregation in Los Angeles
• Abstracts: Verbal self-reports of emergent relations in a stimulus equivalence procedure. Stimulus equivalence: effects of a default-response option on emergence of untrained stimulus relations
• Abstracts: On the origins of misguided theories of naming and other symbolic behavior. Listener behavior and ostensive learning
• Abstracts: The appearance of acute, healing, and healed anogenital trauma

This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.