Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Zoology and wildlife conservation

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Zoology and wildlife conservation

A good year for US biotech, but caution is still advised

Article Abstract:

Biotechnology shares in the stock market perked up in the second half of 1995, resulting in total gain in stock value of 68.4% for the year 1995. This was due to encouraging results from clinical trials, sales and manufacture of new drugs. However, some observers note that the good times for the industry may not last. They claim that young stock analysts lack proper training while drugs undergoing development may either underperform or be too costly. Biotechnology companies may benefit from mergers while second-generation managers may aid in improving sustainability.

Author: Lehrman, Sally
Publisher: Macmillan Publishing Ltd.
Publication Name: Nature
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0028-0836
Year: 1996
Economic aspects, Biotechnology industry, Biotechnology industries

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


GM backlash leaves US farmers wondering how to sell their crops

Article Abstract:

American farmers are feeling the effects of a consumer movement against genetically modified (GM) foods which has spread across Europe and Japan. The farmers, while appreciating the convenience of the built-in pesticides in GM crops, fear they will not be able to find buyers for their harvests. The American Corn Growers Association has advised its members not to plant GM maize, while the Organic Trade Association is debating how best to protect its members' crops from 'genetic trespass'.

Author: Lehrman, Sally
Publisher: Macmillan Publishing Ltd.
Publication Name: Nature
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0028-0836
Year: 1999
Marketing, Plants, Plants (Organisms), Genetically modified plants, Corn, Diseases and pests, Plant biotechnology

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


US proposes relaxing rules on trials of biotech crops

Article Abstract:

Environmentalists and industry advocates alike are displeased with proposed rules that would loosen regulations governing trials of genetically altered crops. Environmentalists fear that since no advance notice of a crop trial would be required, there would be no opportunity for public comment. Biotechnology companies fear that a relaxation of federal rules would prompt more restrictive ones by the states.

Author: Lehrman, Sally
Publisher: Macmillan Publishing Ltd.
Publication Name: Nature
Subject: Zoology and wildlife conservation
ISSN: 0028-0836
Year: 1992
Laws, regulations and rules, Agricultural biotechnology

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA

Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Breezing into town. Statistical model leaves Peru counting the cost of civil war. When the chips are down
  • Abstracts: Chart toppers: An exhibition explores the diverse ways of putting data on the map. Maintaining Masaccio: new data from the restored 'Trinity' in Florence
  • Abstracts: Risky argument over cause and effect. Kinder, gentler, more useful mathematics. Texas A & M struggles to gain the respect that its researchers have already won
  • Abstracts: NAS to redo atomic studies found to be flawed. Computer network rumours prove hard to kill
  • Abstracts: Looking inside quantum dots. Observation of 'scarred' wavefunctions in a quantum well with chaotic electron dynamics
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2026 Advameg, Inc.